Graphpad Graphing Software

Questions & Answers / Clarifications

This document provides answers to vendor questions and additional information regarding the Graphpad Software requirement.

• Requirement Type: This is a renewal requirement, not a new one.
• Previous Purchase Order: The current purchase order ending in June is HT9425-25-P-0081.
• License Administrator Contact: Ryan Jorgensen is the point of contact for this action. His email is ryan.r.jorgensen.civ@health.mil.
• Requirement Details: This is a brand-name requirement specifically for Graphpad Software.
• Quantity: The government is seeking 190 licenses of the Standard plan.
• Quoting Reference: When contacting Graphpad for information, reference quote #46910476.

No specific impact on solicitation deadlines or submission rules is mentioned, but bidders should note the brand-name nature of the requirement and the specific quantity and license type sought.

Statement of Work (SOW) / Performance Work Statement (PWS)

To provide GraphPad licenses for 190 systems for scientific graphing, comprehensive curve fitting (nonlinear regression), understandable statistics, and data organization software.

The contractor shall provide software meeting the following Minimum Essential Characteristics (MECs):

Statistical Comparison Tests:

• Paired or unpaired t tests
• Nonparametric Mann-Whitney test (with confidence interval of medians)
• Kolmogorov-Smirnov test
• Wilcoxon test (with confidence interval of median)
• One-way ANOVA (ordinary or repeated measures) with post-hoc tests (Tukey, Newman-Keuls, Dunnett, Bonferroni, Holm-Sidak), Fisher's Least Significant tests, and Greenhouse-Geisser correction.
• Kruskal-Wallis or Friedman nonparametric one-way ANOVA with Dunn's posttest.
• Fisher's exact test or chi-square test (calculating relative risk and odds ratio with confidence intervals).
• Two-way ANOVA (with repeated measures in one or both factors) with post-hoc tests.
• Kaplan-Meier survival analysis (with log-rank test).

Column Statistics:

• Calculation of info, max, quartiles, mean, SD, SEM, CI, CV.
• Mean or geometric mean with confidence intervals.
• Frequency distributions (bin to histogram), including cumulative histograms.
• Normality testing (three methods).
• One sample t test or Wilcoxon test (comparing column mean/median to theoretical value).
• Skewness and Kurtosis.
• Outlier identification (Grnbbs or ROUT method).

Regression and Correlation:

• Linear regression and correlation.
• Nonlinear regression.

Clinical Statistics:

• Clinical (diagnostic) lab statistics.
• Bland-Altman plots.
• Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves.

Software Licensing:

• All software licensing, warranty, and services must be in accordance with Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) terms and conditions.

Not specified in this document.

• 190 systems require GraphPad licenses.
• Software must meet all listed Minimum Essential Characteristics.
• OEM terms and conditions apply to licensing, warranty, and services.

Solicitation / RFP / RFQ

This document is a solicitation (HT942626QE027) for "GraphPad Graphing Software." The government is procuring licenses for this software.

• The primary deliverable is "License for Graphpad graphing software."

• Product Service Code: 7A21

• The software is for use at the ARMY MED RES INST OF DESEASE - MM, located at Fort Detrick, MD.

• Pricing Arrangement: Firm Fixed Price.

• Estimated contract value is not explicitly stated in this section, but the NAICS code 513210 has a size standard of USD 47,000,000.00.

• Period of Performance: Delivery is scheduled from 23 Jun 2026 to 22 Jun 2027.

• Solicitation Issue Date: 05 May 2026

• Offer Due Date/Local Time: 21 May 2026, 10:00 AM.

• Evaluation factors are detailed in an attached addendum (Attachment 02).

• Instructions for Offerors are provided in Attachment 01.

• This acquisition is marked as "UNRESTRICTED."

• The document incorporates FAR clauses by reference, including those related to commercial products and services (FAR 52.212-1, 52.212-4, 52.212-2).

• Payment instructions will be processed through the Wide Area WorkFlow (WAWF) system.

• Several DFARS clauses are also incorporated by reference, including those related to safeguarding covered defense information and cyber incident reporting.

Solicitation / RFP / RFQ

This document is an addendum to FAR 52.212-1, providing specific instructions for responding to this Request for Quote (RFQ). It details the required format and content for quotes to ensure uniformity and facilitate evaluation. The government emphasizes legibility, clarity, completeness, and responsiveness as paramount.

• Quotes must be precise, factual, and complete.

• Offerors must comply with FAR 52.207-7, System for Award Management (SAM), ensuring all required representations and certifications are completed and uploaded to their SAM record by the quote receipt date.

• Quotes must be submitted in two separate volumes: Volume 1 (Technical) and Volume 2 (Business).

• Files shall not contain classified data or hyperlinks.

• Not specified in this document.

• Submission Deadline: 21 May 2026, by 10:00 AM Eastern Time.

• Submission Method: Electronically via email to Mr. Ryan Jorgensen (ryan.r.jorgensen.civ@health.mil) and Ms. Tonya Kreps (tonya.r.kreps.civ@health.mil).

• Questions Deadline: 11 May 2026, by 10:00 AM Eastern Time. Questions must be submitted in writing via email to the same POCs.

• Quote Format:

  • General: Clearly indexed, logically assembled, legible. Use 12-point Times New Roman font, single-spacing, 1.0-inch margins. Spell out acronyms on first use.
  • Volumes: Each volume must be a separate, labeled document.
  • Volume 1 (Technical): Limited to 10 single-sided pages (excluding title page, table of contents, acronyms page, and marketing brochures). Must demonstrate conformance to Essential Characteristics and the Performance Work Statement.
  • Volume 2 (Business): Must include all pricing data (per CLIN, with part/model numbers if relevant), completed Offeror Representations and Certifications (FAR 52.212-3, FAR 52.204-24, FAR 52.229-11, DFARS 252.204-7016, DFARS 252.204-7017 if applicable), and a signed SF 1449 with acknowledged amendments.
  • File Format: Microsoft Word or searchable PDF. No zipped files accepted.

• Offerors must have an active SAM record with all required representations and certifications to be eligible for award.

• The government will not reimburse offerors for costs incurred in preparing or submitting a quote.

• All quoted information is subject to government verification. Falsification may lead to prosecution.

Solicitation / RFP / RFQ

This document outlines the evaluation criteria and basis for contract award for a Firm-Fixed Price (FFP) contract. The government intends to award a single contract to the responsible offeror whose proposal is most advantageous, considering price and other factors. This is a best-value procurement, and the government may award without discussions, but reserves the right to hold discussions if necessary. The government also reserves the right to make no award.

Proposals will be evaluated based on three factors:

• Evaluation Factor A – Technical: Assesses the risk to the government based on the comprehensiveness, depth, and quality of the offeror's technical proposal. This factor is significantly more important than Factor B.

• Evaluation Factor B – Completeness: Evaluates the completeness of the Business volume submitted by the offeror. An award will only be made to an offeror with a complete Business volume. This factor is significantly more important than Factor C, but less important than Factor A.

• Evaluation Factor C – Price Reasonableness: Examines the proposed rates and total price to determine fair and reasonable pricing. This factor is less important than Factors A and B combined.

• Contract Type: Firm-Fixed Price (FFP)

• Award Basis: Best-value procurement, considering price and other factors.

• Evaluation Approach: Trade-off basis, considering all three factors. Non-price factors (A and B) combined are significantly more important than price (C). Award may be made to a higher-priced offeror if justified by superior technical merit or completeness.

• Minimum Requirements: Offerors must achieve a minimum rating of "Acceptable (Green)" for Technical (Factor A) and "Satisfactory Confidence" or "Neutral Confidence" for Completeness (Factor B) to be considered for award.

• Technical Volume Evaluation: Rated using "Outstanding," "Good," "Acceptable," "Marginal," and "Unacceptable" ratings, with "Acceptable" being the minimum.

• Business Volume Evaluation: Evaluated separately for completeness and not used in trade-off analysis. Incomplete volumes may be revised during discussions or clarifications.

• Price Volume Evaluation: Assesses fair and reasonable pricing using various techniques (e.g., competition, market research, historical prices).

Not specified in this document.

• Information must be submitted in the appropriate volume to be evaluated.
• The government will not assume capabilities not explicitly stated in the Technical volume.
• A written notice of award will result in a binding contract.