MAPS RFP Draft 5, Virtual Listening Session & Survey!

Other / Unclassified

This document contains slides from a "Marketplace for the Acquisition of Professional Services (MAPS) Virtual Listening Session" held by the U.S. Army ACC-APG on March 12, 2026. It outlines the agenda, key notes, proposed timeline, and highlighted changes from Draft 4 to Draft 5 of the MAPS solicitation. It also details commonly used acronyms, information on Joint Ventures, Qualifying Project (QP) updates, evaluation criteria, and scorecard details.

This document provides crucial context and updates for potential bidders regarding the MAPS initiative. Key information includes:

• Timeline: A proposed timeline with key dates such as Solicitation Release (End of March/Beginning of April 2026), Proposal Due Date (End of April 2026), and MAPS Award (End of July/Beginning of August 2026). Note that the timeline is contingent upon survey results.
• Key Notes: Clarifies that MAPS is intended for "Commercial-Sector Vendors" and is a Professional Services Contract, not for developing commercial capabilities. It also encourages participation in a released survey.
• Changes from Draft 4 to Draft 5: Highlights significant modifications, including an increase in awardees per domain from 50 to 70, changes in minimum guarantee, removal of the "50% bid rate" off-ramp criteria, and a shift in evaluation to the "Highest Rated Technical Offeror." Subcontracting rules and technical domains have also been updated.
• Evaluation Criteria: Details the structure of the scorecard, including points allocated for Dollar Values, Passthrough Rate, and Commercial-Sector Vendor Recency. It also outlines the CSV tie-breaker mechanism.
• Industry Feedback: The document emphasizes that updates are based on industry feedback and encourages participation in a survey for further input.

Amendment / Modification

This document summarizes changes made to Draft 5 of the solicitation, specifically affecting Sections C, H, L, and M.

Key changes include:

• Section C: Addition of Section C.
• Section H (Special Contract Requirements):
  • Definitions moved/added.
  • Minimum guarantee updated to $100, with a mandatory virtual post-award meeting.
  • Maximum allowable fee rate ceilings established for Cost-Plus-Fixed-Fee contracts.
  • Ordering procedures revised to clarify orders will not be used for commercial capability development.
  • Off-Ramp criteria expanded, and the 50% bid rate requirement removed.
  • Intellectual Property language added.
  • Language added clarifying allowability of fees on subcontracted effort.
  • SCA Compliance Requirement (Prior H.14) removed.
  • APG Vendor Report language added.
  • Electronic Cost Reporting and Financial Tracking (eCraft) System Reporting language added.
• Section L (Instructions to Offerors):
  • Technical Services Domain renamed to Engineering, Logistics and Operational Services Domain.
  • Emerging Large Business criteria updated across applicable sections.
  • Language added regarding Joint Ventures.
  • Approved Rate Agreements and Earned Value Management System removed from Scorecard; requirements for Emerging Large Businesses added.
  • Definitions for "Level of Effort (LOE) Qualifying Project (QP)" and "Outcome-Based QP" updated.
  • Clarification added regarding evaluation criteria for "Level of Effort" or "Outcome-Based" QPs.
• Section M (Evaluation Factors):
  • Number of anticipated awardees updated, and socio-economic categories removed from Basis for Award.
  • Tie Breaker Criteria for Commercial-Sector Vendors updated.
  • Gate criteria added for Emerging Large Businesses in Screening Questions.
  • Point allocations updated for Systems and Certifications; removed prior systems/agreements and added criteria for Emerging Large Businesses.
  • Point allocations updated for Past Performance; criteria added for Emerging Large Businesses.
  • Recency criteria revised for Commercial-Sector Vendors.
  • Emerging IT Domain Technical Capabilities updated for Performance Quality.
  • Evaluated dollar value thresholds updated based on business size.
  • New evaluation criteria added for passthrough rate, schedule, and proposal completeness.
  • Evaluation criteria added for Price.

Sections C, H, L, and M of the solicitation have been modified. Specific clauses, definitions, and evaluation criteria within these sections have been updated or added.

Solicitation / RFP / RFQ

This document is a DRAFT Request for Proposal (RFP) for the Marketplace for the Acquisition of Professional Services (MAPS) IDIQ contract. The Army Contracting Command-Aberdeen Proving Ground (ACC-APG) intends to award a Multiple Award (MA) Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract. The MAPS IDIQ contract aims to provide Army customers and other federal agencies with knowledge-based professional services and IT services worldwide to support Army enterprise infrastructure and infostructure goals. The objective is to enhance flexibility, reduce redundancy, and improve cost-efficiency in acquiring these services.

The Performance Work Statement (PWS) outlines requirements for contractor-provided support services for mission areas with knowledge-based service-related requirements. Key technical support areas include:

• Engineering, Logistics and Operational Services
• Research, Development, Test and Evaluation (RDT&E) Services
• Management and Advisory Services
• Emerging IT Services
• Foundational IT Services

Services explicitly excluded from the scope include Inherently Governmental Functions, Personal Services, Architect & Engineering (A&E) Services, and Construction Services.

• Contract Type: Multiple Award Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (MA IDIQ).

• Period of Performance: Maximum ordering period of 10 years (5-year Base Ordering Period + one 5-year Optional Ordering Period).

• Task Order Types: Fixed Price (FP), Time-and-Materials (T&M), and Cost Reimbursement (CR), or a hybrid of these.

• Submission: Proposals will be submitted through the Digital Market Portal.

• Evaluation: The Government will evaluate proposals based on a multi-phase approach including initial self-scores, verification review, and final gate criteria. Evaluation factors include Screening Questions, Systems and Certifications, Past Performance (including Recency, Relevancy, NAICS Alignment, Performance Quality, Dollar Value, Vacancy Rate, Time to Fill Rate, Passthrough Rate, Schedule, and Completeness), and Price.

• Key Deadlines: Not explicitly stated in this draft, but proposal validity is required for a minimum of 360 calendar days.

• The base contract will be utilized with full and open competition, with reserved awards for small businesses.

• Orders may be restricted to Small Businesses based on market research.

• Specific business size categories (Large Businesses, Emerging Large Businesses, Small Businesses, Commercial-Sector Vendors) are defined and have specific evaluation criteria.

• This is a DRAFT RFP.

• The document details extensive requirements for security clearances, training, certifications (e.g., CMMC, ISO 9001), acceptable government systems, and reporting (e.g., eCRAFT, APG Vendor Report).

• Specific details regarding contract clauses, attachments, and evaluation criteria are provided throughout the document.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document, "Attachment 0002 Scorecard - Commercial-Sector Vendors," serves as a self-scoring tool and evaluation guide for commercial-sector vendors responding to a solicitation. It outlines the criteria and point system used to evaluate proposals.

Section 01 - Screening Questions:

• Ensures offerors meet basic eligibility requirements:
  • Have all submission requirements been met (referencing RFP Section L.1).
  • Are they a "Commercial-Sector Vendor" (defined as not having performed government contracts for commercial services in the prior four years).
  • Are they CMMC Final Level 2 (self) certified, requiring documentation via SPRS certificate screenshot.
• Crucially, if any of these screening questions are answered 'NO', the proposal will not be evaluated further.

Section 02 - Scorecard: This section details the point allocation for various evaluation categories:

• Government Approved Systems, Agreements and Certifications: Points awarded for Facility Clearance (SECRET/TOP SECRET), CMMC Level 2 certification, ISO 9001:2013/2015, and ISO/IEC 27001:2022 certifications.
• Past Performance: Points awarded based on:
  • Recency: For completed projects within the last 2 years or ongoing projects with at least one year of performance within the last year.
  • Relevance: Based on the percentage of Technical Capabilities met within the proposed domain.
  • NAICS Alignment: For aligning Quality Projects (QP) with proposed domain-specific NAICS codes.
  • Performance Quality: Based on CPARS/PPQ ratings (Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Neutral, Marginal).
  • Dollar Value: Based on the total contract value of QPs.
  • Passthrough Rate: Based on the percentage of work performed by subcontractors.
  • Vacancy Rate: Based on the percentage of vacant positions.
  • Time to Fill Rate: Based on the number of days to fill positions.
• Outcome Based QPs: Points awarded based on meeting Acceptable Quality Levels (AQL) and documented efficiencies.

This scorecard is critical for bidders as it directly outlines how their proposal will be evaluated and scored. Bidders must:

• Carefully review the screening questions to ensure eligibility.
• Understand the point values assigned to each certification, past performance metric, and outcome-based criterion.
• Prepare their proposals to maximize points in each category, providing necessary documentation and evidence as specified.
• The maximum total credits available are 130,000.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document is a Cover Letter Form (Attachment 0001) required for proposals submitted under the "MARKETPLACE FOR THE ACQUISITION OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES". It serves to collect essential information about the proposing prime company and their proposed domains and business sizes.

• Prime Company Information: Fields for Prime Company Name, Point of Contact (name, email, phone), Company CAGE Code, and Company UEI.
• Proposed Domains: Bidders must indicate if they are proposing to the following domains and select their business size for each proposed domain:
  • Engineering, Logistics and Operational Services Domain
  • Management and Advisory Services Domain
  • Research, Development, Test & Evaluation Services Domain
  • Emerging IT Services Domain
  • Foundational IT Services Domain
• Business Size Options: For each domain, bidders select from LARGE BUSINESS, EMERGING LARGE BUSINESS, SMALL BUSINESS, or COMMERCIAL-SECTOR VENDOR.
• Affiliate/Subsidiary Information: Fields for CAGE Code and UEI if applicable.
• Joint Venture/Mentor Protégé Information: Sections to indicate JV or Mentor Protégé status, details of the JV company or Mentor/Protégé names, CAGE codes, and UEIs. It also asks which systems and/or certifications are being used from JV or MP members.
• Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI): A section to disclose any known or potential OCI.

This form is critical for bidders to accurately represent their company's structure, proposed service areas, and business size classifications. Proper completion is necessary for proposal eligibility and evaluation within the specified domains. It also captures important information regarding potential joint ventures, mentor-protégé relationships, and conflicts of interest.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document, "Attachment 0002 Scorecard - Large Businesses," serves as a screening questionnaire and a detailed scorecard for evaluating proposals from large businesses. It outlines the mandatory requirements and the scoring criteria for various aspects of a proposal.

Section 01 - Screening Questions:

• Requires confirmation of meeting all submission requirements as per RFP Section L.1.
• Asks about mandatory certifications and systems:
  • Active SECRET facility clearance
  • ISO 9001:2015 or ISO 9001:2013 certification
  • CMMC Final Level 2 (self) certification
  • Government Determined Acceptable Accounting System
  • Government Determined Acceptable Purchasing System
• For large businesses, it includes a critical question regarding CPARS ratings: if 5% or more of element ratings are MARGINAL or below for the identified NAICS codes over the last three years, the offeror is excluded.
• Crucially, answering "NO" to any screening question results in the proposal not being evaluated further.

Section 02 - Scorecard:

• Details the point system for evaluating proposals across several categories:
  • Government Approved Systems, Agreements and Certifications: Points awarded for Property Management System, TOP SECRET Facility Clearance, CMMC Level 2 Certification, and ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Certification.
  • Past Performance: Points awarded based on Recency, Relevance (to technical capabilities), NAICS Alignment, Performance Quality (based on CPARS/PPQ ratings), and Dollar Value of past contracts.
  • Passthrough Rate: Points awarded based on the percentage of work performed by subcontractors.
  • Vacancy Rate: Points awarded based on the offeror's vacancy rate.
  • Time to Fill Rate: Points awarded based on the average time to fill open positions.
  • LOE QPS ONLY: Points awarded for Schedule and Completeness metrics.

This document is critical for large business bidders as it defines the minimum qualifications and the detailed evaluation criteria. Bidders must ensure they meet all screening requirements to be considered. The scorecard provides a clear breakdown of how points are awarded, allowing bidders to understand the relative importance of different factors and tailor their proposals accordingly to maximize their score. It highlights the significant weight given to certifications, past performance, and specific operational metrics.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document is a scorecard used for evaluating proposals, specifically for "Emerging Large Businesses" in the context of the MAPS acquisition. It outlines screening questions and a detailed scoring rubric for various aspects of a proposal.

Section 01 - Screening Questions:

• Emerging Large Business Status: Requires proof of not being a small business, becoming other-than-small within the last five years, and having average annual revenue not exceeding $50M over the last three years. Documentation includes SAM.gov update history or SBA determination, and audited financial statements or CPA letter for revenue.
• Facility Clearance: Requires proof of an active SECRET facility clearance.
• ISO Certification: Requires verification of current ISO 9001:2015 or ISO 9001:2013 certification.
• CMMC Certification: Requires documentation of CMMC Final Level 2 (self) or higher certification, including an SPRS certificate screenshot.
• CPARS Threshold: Assesses if the CAGE Code meets thresholds for performance elements rated MARGINAL or below in CPARS over the last three years for specified NAICS codes. Offers with 10% or more MARGINAL ratings are excluded.
• Eligibility: Answering "NO" to any screening question disqualifies the proposal from further evaluation.

Section 02 - Scorecard: Details the point allocation for various evaluation factors, including:

• Government Approved Systems, Agreements and Certifications (e.g., Property Management System, Purchasing System, Accounting System, TOP SECRET Facility Clearance, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, CMMC Level 2)
• Past Performance (Recency, Relevance, NAICS Alignment, Performance Quality, Dollar Value, Passthrough Rate, Vacancy Rate, Time to Fill Rate)
• Outcome Based QPs (Schedule, Completeness)

This document is critical for bidders to understand the specific criteria and requirements for qualifying as an "Emerging Large Business" and how their proposal will be evaluated. Bidders must ensure they meet all screening requirements and understand the point system for each evaluation factor to tailor their proposals effectively and maximize their scores.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document, "Attachment 0002 Scorecard - Small Businesses," serves as a screening tool and evaluation scorecard for potential bidders. It outlines the mandatory requirements and the scoring methodology for proposals.

Section 01 - Screening Questions:

• Verifies if all submission requirements are met.
• Confirms if the offeror is a Small Business and provides Small Business Certification.
• Checks for an active SECRET facility clearance.
• Requires verification of ISO 9001:2015 or ISO 9001:2013 certification.
• Requires documentation of CMMC Final Level 2 (self) or higher certification.
• Assesses if the CAGE Code meets the threshold for performance elements rated MARGINAL or below in CPARS.
• Crucially, if any of these screening questions are answered 'NO', the proposal will not be evaluated further.

Section 02 - Scorecard:

• Details the point allocation for various capabilities, including:
  • Government Approved Systems, Agreements and Certifications (e.g., Property Management System, Purchasing System, Accounting System, Facility Clearance, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, CMMC Level 2).
  • Past Performance (Recency, Relevance, NAICS Alignment, Performance Quality, Dollar Value, Passthrough Rate, Vacancy Rate, Time to Fill Rate).
  • Outcome Based QPs (Schedule, Completeness).
• Specifies the maximum points for each category and the criteria for earning those points.

This document is critical for bidders to understand the minimum qualifications required to even have their proposal considered. It also provides a detailed breakdown of how their proposal will be evaluated and scored, allowing them to tailor their submission to maximize their points in each category. Bidders must pay close attention to the screening questions and the specific criteria for each scorecard element to ensure compliance and competitive positioning.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document is a "Qualifying Project Form" (Attachment 0003) used to assess the relevance of an offeror's past performance to a proposed domain within a solicitation. It requires offerors to provide details about a specific project (QP) to demonstrate how it aligns with the Performance Work Statement (PWS) and the proposed domain.

• Qualifying Project Number: Identifies the specific project being submitted.
• Contracting Party Point of Contact: Information for the government or private official.
• Specific Contract/Agreement Number: Details of the contract under which the QP was performed.
• Proposed Domain(s): The domain(s) against which the QP will be evaluated.
• Period of Performance: Requirements for the duration and age of the QP (e.g., at least one year for large businesses, complete for commercial-sector vendors).
• Technical Capabilities Alignment: Identification of which PWS technical capabilities the QP aligns with.
• PWS Mapping Description: A brief description demonstrating how the work performed in the QP is relevant to the offeror's proposed domain and the PWS.
• NAICS Code: Identification and explanation of the relevant NAICS code.
• Attachment 0004 PPQs: Confirmation if Past Performance Questionnaires will be submitted.
• Dollar Value: The value of the QP.
• Vacancy Rate: For last full year of performance (N/A for Commercial-Sector Vendors).
• Average Time to Fill Rate: (N/A for Commercial-Sector Vendors).
• Passthrough Rate: Calculation of subcontractor labor dollars to total labor dollars.
• Schedule Rate: (N/A for Large, Emerging Large and Small Businesses).
• Completeness and Documented Efficiencies: (N/A for Large, Emerging Large and Small Businesses).
• QP Type: Line of Effort (LOE) QP or Outcome Based QP.
• Certification: Confirmation of accuracy by government or private official and the offeror.
• Affiliate/Subsidiary Information: Details if the QP was performed by a different legal entity.

This form is crucial for bidders to demonstrate their relevant past performance. Offerors must accurately complete this form, providing clear descriptions and supporting documentation (like the PWS and contract details) to show how their previous projects align with the government's requirements and proposed domains. Failure to adequately complete this form may impact the evaluation of their proposal.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) Form (Attachment 0004) used to gather information on a contractor's past and current performance. This information will be used in the awarding of a federal contract. The form requires specific adjectival ratings (Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, Unsatisfactory) with explanations for each.

• Part I: General Information: Collects basic contract details such as Contractor, Contract Number, POC, POC Title, and Agency/Company contact information.
• Part II: Contract Identification: To be completed by the Offeror, this section includes fields for Contractor/Company Name, Address, Program Identification/Title, Contract Number, NAICS Code, Prime Contractor Name, Contract Award Date, Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date, and Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased.
• Part III: Evaluation: To be completed by the Government/Customer POC, this section evaluates performance across several categories: Quality, Schedule, Cost Control, Management, Small Business Subcontracting, and Regulatory Compliance. Each category requires an adjectival rating and a detailed explanation.
• Part IV: Return Information: Collects the Government/Customer Respondent's identification details.

This form is crucial for potential bidders as it outlines the criteria and format for providing past performance information. Understanding these evaluation areas and the expected level of detail in the explanations will help bidders prepare their own past performance submissions and understand how their performance will be assessed. It also serves as a template for how the government will solicit feedback on contractor performance.

Other / Unclassified

This document is an industry update and agenda for the "Marketplace for the Acquisition of Professional Services (MAPS) Industry Day" held by ACC-APG on January 28, 2025. It outlines upcoming opportunities across various divisions (A, B, C, D, and Installation and Technology Division), provides information on industry days, and discusses trends and other topics relevant to potential bidders. The document also includes ground rules for the update, emphasizing that discussions are non-binding and all presented information is subject to change. It details the structure of the MAPS IDIQ contract, its scope, and a proposed timeline for solicitation, proposal due date, and award.

This document is highly relevant for potential bidders as it provides an overview of upcoming opportunities, outlines the structure and scope of the MAPS IDIQ contract, and details the proposed timeline for the solicitation process. It highlights key areas of interest for various Army divisions and offers insights into the government's acquisition strategy for professional services. The information can help vendors assess their suitability for the opportunity and prepare for future solicitations.

Questions & Answers / Clarifications

This document contains questions and answers from an industry update event, likely related to Army contracting opportunities and processes.

• Incumbent Contracts: No incumbent contract for C2 Technology Innovation and Integration work; it's a new contract.

• CSO vs. IDIQ: CSOs are typically used for unique, innovative solutions to general problem statements, while IDIQs are for known/enduring requirements.

• Non-Traditional Contractors: The definition is codified in law, and contracting teams are trained to ensure compliance.

• SETA Contract Consolidation: This is being discussed for operational efficiency, potentially impacting existing contracts. Concerns exist regarding impacts on small businesses and past performance alignment. The approach to consolidation (fewer IDIQs, larger scope, new vehicles) is still being determined.

• Evaluation Process Streamlining: The government is exploring methods like limiting evaluation factors, using oral presentations, demonstrations, AI tools, and phased evaluations for faster awards.

• Army Open Solicitation (AOS): It is open to all vendors and found on SAM.gov. Response timelines are typically 90 days for Phase 1, but subject to mission partner acceptance and volume.

• AIDP-Next: This is a separate effort from C5ISR MOBILE. Details on requirements, TRL levels, and security domains will be provided at the AIDP Next Industry Day.

• Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC): This is a DoD program to standardize cybersecurity practices and protect sensitive information, with compliance becoming a requirement for DoD contracts.

• Several efforts are paused or delayed, with updates to be provided. Some requirements are being reconsidered or included in broader opportunities.

• The Army's reorganization into PAEs aims to accelerate procurement and improve efficiency, not directly cancel procurements.

• The use of GSA instruments versus vehicles like RS3 is being evaluated for cost savings and efficiency.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document is a Cover Letter Form (Attachment 0001) required for proposals submitted under the "MARKETPLACE FOR THE ACQUISITION OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - MAPS" initiative. It serves to collect essential information about the proposing company and their proposed participation in various domains.

• Prime Company Information: Requires the company name, point of contact details (name, email, phone), CAGE Code, and UEI.
• Domain Participation: Bidders must indicate whether they are proposing to the Technical Domain, Management and Advisory Domain, Research, Development, Test & Evaluation Domain, Emerging IT Domain, and Foundational IT Domain. For each domain, they must specify if they are proposing and select their business type (Large Business, Small Business, Non-Traditional Defense Contractor) and Socioeconomic Category (if applicable).
• Affiliate/Subsidiary Information: Fields for Affiliate/Subsidiary CAGE Code and UEI are provided if applicable.
• Joint Venture/Mentor Protégé Information: Sections to indicate if proposing as a Joint Venture (JV) or as a Mentor/Protégé, including details like JV company name, CAGE Code, UEI, Mentor/Protégé names, and CAGE Codes.
• Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI): A section to disclose any known or potential OCI.

This form is critical for bidders to complete accurately as it captures fundamental information about their company's structure, proposed offerings, and compliance status. It directly impacts how the government assesses the proposal's eligibility and suitability for different domains within the MAPS initiative.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document, "MAPS - SMALL BUSINESS ATTACHMENT 0002," serves as a scorecard and gate criteria checklist for potential bidders responding to a solicitation. It outlines the requirements and evaluation criteria for small businesses participating in the MAPS (Marketplace for the Acquisition of Professional Services) initiative.

Section 01 - Gate Criteria:

• Requires bidders to confirm their status as a Small Business and provide relevant certifications (Woman Owned, HUBZone, SDVOSB, SDB, 8a).
• Mandates confirmation of meeting all submission requirements as per RFP Section L.1.
• Requires a SECRET facility clearance with supporting documentation.
• Requires ISO 9001:2015 or ISO 9001:2013 certification with verification details.
• Requires CMMC Final Level 2 (self) or higher certification.
• Assesses CAGE Code performance against CPARS thresholds for the last three years across identified NAICS codes. Offers with five or more elements rated MARGINAL or below are excluded.
• Crucially, failure to meet any "YES" requirement in Section 01 results in the proposal not being evaluated further.

Section 02 - Scorecard: This section details the point-based evaluation for qualified bidders, covering:

• Government Approved Systems, Agreements and Certifications: Points awarded for approved Rate Agreements, and acceptable Purchasing, Accounting, Estimating, Property Management, and Earned Value Management Systems. Also includes points for TOP SECRET Facility Clearance, CMMC Level 2 (C3PAO) Certification, and ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Certification.
• Past Performance: Evaluates Recency, Relevance, NAICS Alignment, Performance Quality, and Dollar Value of submitted Qualified Projects (QPs).
• Vacancy Rate: Awards points based on the vacancy rate of QPs.

This attachment is critical for bidders to understand the mandatory pre-qualification criteria (gate criteria) that must be met to have their proposal considered. It also provides a detailed breakdown of the scoring methodology for the technical evaluation, allowing bidders to assess their strengths and weaknesses and tailor their proposals accordingly. Bidders must carefully review and address all requirements in Section 01 and understand how their past performance and other factors will be scored in Section 02.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document, "Attachment 0002 Scorecard Commercial-Sector Vendors," serves as a scoring mechanism for potential bidders responding to a solicitation. It outlines the gate criteria for eligibility and the detailed scorecard for evaluating proposals based on various factors.

Section 01 - Gate Criteria:

• Commercial-Sector Vendor Status: Bidders must confirm they are not currently performing or have not performed commercial services contracts with the Department of War or the US Government in the four years prior to the solicitation date.
• SAM Registration: Company must be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM).
• Submission Requirements: All submission requirements, as detailed in RFP Section L.1, must be met.
• CMMC Certification: Offerors must provide documentation of CMMC Final Level 2 (self) certification or higher. A screenshot of the SPRS certificate is acceptable.
• Note: Answering 'NO' to any gate criteria question disqualifies the proposal from further evaluation.

Section 02 - Scorecard: This section details the point allocation for various evaluation factors, including:

• Government Approved Systems, Agreements and Certifications: Points awarded for active TOP SECRET Facility Clearance, CMMC Level 2 (C3PAO) certifications (conditional or final), and ISO 9001:2015/2013 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 certifications.
• Past Performance: Evaluated based on Recency, Relevance (to technical capabilities), NAICS Alignment, Performance Quality (based on CPARS/PPQ ratings), and Dollar Value of previous contracts for up to three Qualified Projects (QPs).
• Vacancy Rate: Points awarded based on the percentage of unfilled positions.
• Time to Fill Rate: Points awarded based on the average number of days to fill open positions.

This scorecard is critical for bidders as it explicitly defines the criteria and weighting used to evaluate their proposals. Understanding these requirements allows vendors to:

• Determine their eligibility based on the gate criteria.
• Prepare documentation to demonstrate compliance with certifications and past performance requirements.
• Strategize their proposal content to maximize points in each category, particularly in Past Performance and Certifications.
• Self-score their proposal to estimate their competitive standing.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document, "Systems, Agreements and Certifications Small Business Attachment 0003," is a form designed to collect specific information from offerors regarding their company's systems and certifications. It requires bidders to answer a series of yes/no questions and provide supporting documentation to verify their compliance and capabilities.

The form asks about the following:

• Approved Rate Agreements (e.g., Forward Pricing/Billing)
• Government-approved Purchasing System
• Government-approved Accounting System
• Government-approved Estimating System
• Government-approved Property Management System
• Government-approved Earned Value Management System
• Active TOP SECRET Facility Clearance
• Current and active CMMC Level 2 Certification
• Active ISO 27001:2022 certification

For each "yes" answer, specific documentation requirements are outlined, including providing verification from relevant agencies (DCAA, DCMA, CFA), official audit reports, letters of approval, and contact information for the approving representatives.

This attachment is critical for bidders to demonstrate their eligibility and capability to perform on contracts requiring specific government-approved systems and certifications. Failure to provide the required documentation for "yes" answers may impact a bidder's ability to be considered for the opportunity. Bidders must carefully review the documentation requirements for each question to ensure they can meet the stated criteria.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document, "Attachment 0003 Systems Agreements and Certifications Large Business," is a form designed to collect specific information from potential bidders regarding their company's systems, agreements, and certifications. It requires bidders to answer a series of questions and provide supporting documentation to demonstrate compliance with various government standards and requirements.

The form asks about the following:

• Approved Rate Agreements (Forward Pricing/Billing)
• Government-approved Estimating System
• Government-approved Property Management System
• Government-approved Earned Value Management System
• Active TOP SECRET Facility Clearance
• Complete and active CMMC Conditional or Final Level 2 Certification (C3PAO) or higher
• Active ISO 27001:2022 certification

For each item, bidders must provide current verification, official letters, audit reports, or other specified documentation in a single PDF file. Contact information for the approving agency representative is also required.

This attachment is crucial for bidders to determine their eligibility and to prepare the necessary documentation to demonstrate compliance with critical systems and certifications required for this opportunity. Failure to provide the requested information and documentation may impact a bidder's ability to be considered for award. Bidders must carefully review each question and ensure they can provide the required proof.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document, "Systems, Agreements and Certifications Commercial-Sector Vendors Attachment 0003," is a form requiring vendors to answer specific questions regarding their company's certifications and clearances. It also specifies the documentation required as proof.

• TOP SECRET Facility Clearance: Vendors must confirm if they have an active TOP SECRET Facility Clearance and provide proof.
• CMMC Level 2 Certification: Vendors must confirm if they hold a complete and active CMMC Level 2 Certification (or higher) and provide proof.
• ISO 9001:2015 or ISO 9001:2013 Certification: Vendors must confirm if they are actively certified and provide a copy of the official certification from an approved body, along with contact information for the certifying body's representative.
• ISO 27001:2022 Certification: Vendors must confirm if they are actively certified and provide a copy of the official certification from an approved body, along with contact information for the certifying body's representative.

This form directly impacts proposal preparation by outlining mandatory certifications and clearances required for participation in the opportunity. Bidders must ensure they meet these requirements and have the necessary documentation ready for submission.

Solicitation / RFP / RFQ

This document is a Draft Request for Proposal (RFP) for the Marketplace for the Acquisition of Professional Services (MAPS). The MAPS initiative aims to consolidate the Army Contracting Command – Aberdeen Proving Ground's (ACC-APG) Responsive Strategic Sourcing for Services (RS3) and Product Lead (PL) Digital Market's Information Technology Enterprise Solutions – 3 Services (ITES-3S) IDIQ vehicles into a single, more flexible, and cost-efficient contract vehicle for acquiring knowledge-based professional services. This integration is intended to enhance flexibility, reduce redundancy, and improve cost-efficiency.

• The document outlines the structure of the RFP, including sections for Solicitation/Contract Form, Supplies and Services/Costs (CLIN), Descriptions/Specifications/Work Statement, Packaging and Marking, Inspection and Acceptance, Deliveries or Performance, Contract Administration Data, Special Contract Requirements, Contract Clauses, List of Attachments, Representations/Certifications, Instructions/Conditions/Notices to Offerors, and Evaluation Factors for Award.

• Specific requirements for proposals include detailed information on:

  • Cover Letter (Attachment 0001)
  • Self-Scoring Gate Criteria and Scorecard (Attachment 0002)
  • Systems, Agreements, & Certifications (Attachment 0003)
  • Past Performance (Attachment 0004)
  • Cost (Attachment 0005)
  • Small Business Subcontracting Plan (Attachment 0006) for Large Businesses.

• Offerors must identify the specific Domain(s) they are proposing to, with five identified Domains: Technical Services (NAICS 541330), Management and Advisory Services (NAICS 541611), Research Development Testing and Evaluation (RDT&E) Services (NAICS 541715), Emerging IT Services (NAICS 541512), and Foundational IT Services (NAICS 541519).

• The maximum ordering period may be 10 years, consisting of a five (5) year Base Ordering Period and one (1) five (5) year Optional Ordering Period.

• The minimum guarantee for this acquisition is $500.00.

• Proposal submissions will be made through the Digital Market Portal.

• The proposal shall remain valid for a minimum of 180 calendar days.

• Evaluation will be conducted in phases, starting with initial ranking based on self-scores, followed by a Verification Review and downward adjustments. Tie-breakers are defined for Large/Small Businesses and Commercial-Sector Vendors.

• Awards will be made based on a combination of factors including Gate Criteria, Systems/Agreements/Certifications, Past Performance, Cost, and Small Business Subcontracting Plans (for Large Businesses).

• The Government intends to make approximately 50 awards per Domain, with specific reserve requirements for Large Businesses, Commercial-Sector Vendors, and various Small Business categories (SB, WOSB, SDVOSB, HUBZone, SDV, 8(a)).

• Orders may be restricted to Small Businesses based on market research.

• The RFP outlines specific requirements and evaluation criteria for Large Businesses, Small Businesses, and Commercial-Sector Vendors.

• This is a DRAFT RFP and is not an authorization to start work.

• The Government reserves the right to cancel this requirement without incurring any proposal fees.

• Offerors are cautioned regarding Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI) and the "one contract per entity" rule.

• Specific requirements for facility clearances, certifications (ISO, CMMC), acceptable systems (accounting, estimating, property management, earned value management), and past performance are detailed.

Solicitation / RFP / RFQ

This document is a Draft Request for Proposal (RFP) for the Marketplace for the Acquisition of Professional Services (MAPS). The Army Contracting Command – Aberdeen Proving Ground (ACC-APG) and Program Executive Office (PEO) Enterprise, Computer Hardware, Enterprise Software and Solutions (CHESS) program intend to award a Multiple Award Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract. This contract will be formed by combining the ACC-APG's Responsive Strategic Sourcing for Services (RS3) and the CHESS' Product Lead (PL) Digital Market's Information Technology Enterprise Solutions - 3 Services (ITES-3S) IDIQ Vehicles. The goal is to enhance flexibility, reduce redundancy, and improve cost-efficiency in acquiring knowledge-based professional services and other functions, ensuring a unified approach to meeting the Army's evolving technology and strategic needs.

• The document outlines various sections of the RFP, including Supplies and Services and Prices/Costs (Section B), Descriptions/Specifications/Work Statement (Section C), Packaging and Marking (Section D), Inspection and Acceptance (Section E), Deliveries or Performance (Section F), Contract Administration Data (Section G), Special Contract Requirements (Section H), Contract Clauses (Section I), and List of Attachments (Section J).

• Specific requirements detailed include:

  • Period of Performance (PoP): 5-year Base Period and a 5-year Optional Ordering Period.
  • Place of Performance: Determined per order, may include CONUS and OCONUS.
  • Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS): Procedures for monitoring cost overruns and performance ratings.
  • Special Contract Requirements: Restrictions on mandatory arbitration, minimum guarantee ($500.00), ordering procedures, on-ramps/off-ramps, contracting officer representatives (CORs), small business participation, travel, organizational conflict of interest (OCI), safety, hours of work, government site closures, security requirements, and Service Contract Act (SCA) compliance.
  • Proposal Submission: Instructions for preparing and submitting proposals through the Digital Market Portal, including specific volumes and required attachments.
  • Gate Criteria: Detailed criteria for Large Businesses, Small Businesses, and Commercial-Sector Vendors, including facility clearance, certifications (ISO 9001, CMMC), accounting/purchasing/property management systems, CPARS ratings, and small business certifications.
  • Past Performance: Evaluation of Qualifying Projects (QPs) based on relevance, recency, NAICS alignment, performance quality, dollar value, vacancy rate, and time to fill.

• Contract Type: Multiple Award Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ).

• Maximum Ordering Period: 10 years (5-year Base + 5-year Option).

• Minimum Guarantee: $500.00.

• Proposals must be submitted through the Digital Market Portal.

• Evaluation will be based on a multi-phase process including self-scoring, verification review, gate criteria, past performance, and cost.

• The Government intends to make approximately 50 awards per Domain, with specific set-asides for Large Businesses, Small Businesses, and Commercial-Sector Vendors.

• Tie-breakers will be used in case of equal scores.

• The acquisition aims for full and open competition among MAPS base contract holders.

• Specific set-aside requirements and goals are outlined for Large Businesses, Small Businesses (including various subcategories like WOSB, SDVOSB, HUBZone, 8(a)), and Commercial-Sector Vendors.

• Only one contract per Domain per legal entity is allowed.

• This is a DRAFT RFP. Submission of a proposal constitutes acknowledgment that it is not an authorization to start work.

• Policies outlined in FAR Subpart 15.3 do not apply except as specifically referenced in this RFP.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document is the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) Form, Attachment 0006. It is designed to collect information from the Government/Customer regarding a contractor's past performance on contracts within the last four years. This information is crucial for evaluating potential contractors during the awarding of a federal contract.

The form is divided into four parts:

• Part I: General Information: Collects basic contract details such as Contractor, Contract Number, and Point of Contact (POC) information.
• Part II: Contract Identification: To be completed by the Offeror, this section gathers details about the specific contract being referenced, including contractor name, address, program title, contract number, NAICS code, prime contractor name, award date, completion date, and a description of the contractual effort.
• Part III: Evaluation: To be completed by the Government/Customer POC (Respondent). This is the core of the questionnaire, where evaluators rate the contractor's performance in several categories using adjectival ratings (Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, Unsatisfactory). Categories include:
  • Quality
  • Schedule
  • Cost Control
  • Management
  • Small Business Subcontracting
  • Regulatory Compliance Evaluators are required to provide explanations for their ratings.
• Part IV: Return Information: Collects contact details for the Government/Customer Respondent.

Bidders should be aware that this form will likely be sent to previous Government customers to gather feedback on their performance. The ratings and explanations provided in response to this questionnaire will significantly influence the past performance evaluation factor in the selection process for this opportunity. Bidders should ensure their past performance is well-documented and that their references are prepared to provide accurate and detailed feedback.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document, "Attachment 0002 Scorecard Large Business," serves as a gate criteria and evaluation scorecard for large business offerors responding to the MAPS (Marketplace for the Acquisition of Professional Services) opportunity. It outlines the mandatory requirements for proposal submission and the scoring methodology.

Section 01 - Gate Criteria:

• Requires offerors to meet all submission requirements as per RFP Section L.1.
• Mandatory certifications and system acceptances include:
  • Active SECRET facility clearance.
  • ISO 9001:2015 or ISO 9001:2013 certification.
  • CMMC Final Level 2 (self) certification or higher.
  • Government Determined Acceptable Accounting System.
  • Government Determined Acceptable Purchasing System.
• For Large Businesses, CPARS ratings for the past three years across the five NAICS codes must not have 5% or more elements rated MARGINAL or below. Offerors without CPARS should select N/A.
• Crucially, if any gate criteria question is answered 'NO', the proposal will not be evaluated further.

Section 02 - Scorecard:

• Details the scoring for Government Approved Systems, Agreements and Certifications (e.g., Rate Agreements, Estimating System, Earned Value Management System, Property Management System, Facility Clearance, CMMC, ISO/IEC 27001:2022).
• Outlines Past Performance evaluation criteria, including:
  • Recency of Qualified Projects (QP).
  • Relevance of QP to proposed Domain.
  • NAICS Alignment of QP.
  • Performance Quality of QP (based on CPARS/PPQ ratings).
  • Dollar Value of QP.
  • Vacancy Rate.
  • Time to Fill Rate.
• Bidders are expected to self-score and have their scores verified by the Government.

This document is critical for large business bidders as it defines the minimum qualifications (gate criteria) that must be met to proceed with the evaluation. It also provides a detailed breakdown of how proposals will be scored, allowing bidders to understand the relative importance of various factors such as certifications, systems, and past performance. Bidders must carefully review and address all requirements to ensure their proposal is considered and to maximize their score.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document, "Qualifying Project Form Attachment 0004," is a form that offerors must complete to provide information about a "Qualifying Project" (QP). This form is used to demonstrate how a past project performed by the offeror aligns with the requirements of the current solicitation, particularly concerning the proposed domain and technical capabilities outlined in the Performance Work Statement (PWS).

• Qualifying Project Number: Unique identifier for the project.
• Specific Contract/Agreement Number: The contract number under which the QP was performed.
• Proposed Domain(s): The service area(s) the QP relates to.
• Dollar Value: The total value of the QP.
• NAICS Code: The North American Industry Classification System code for the QP, with a field for explanation if it differs from the agreement's NAICS code.
• Period of Performance: The duration of the QP.
• Government Official/Private Official Point of Contact: Contact information for the QP.
• Technical Capabilities Alignment: Identification of which PWS technical capabilities the QP aligns with.
• Vacancy Rate: Calculation of the vacancy rate for the QP's last full year of performance.
• Average Time to Fill Rate: Calculation of the average time to fill vacancies for the QP.
• Brief description of work mapping to the PWS: A narrative explaining how the QP's work is relevant to the offeror's proposed domain.
• CAGE Code: Information regarding the CAGE code of the entity performing the QP, especially if it differs from the offeror's.
• Legal Entity Confirmation: Confirmation of the legal entity and its relationship to the offeror.

Bidders must complete this form accurately to demonstrate their relevant past performance and capabilities. The information provided will be used to assess the offeror's experience and its alignment with the government's needs as defined in the PWS. The government reserves the right to verify the information provided on this form.

Other / Unclassified

This document is an "Industry Update" from the ACC-APG, intended to present upcoming contracting opportunities from various local contracting divisions and requirements owners. It outlines the divisions and the entities they support:

• Division A: Supports U.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development Command (DEVCOM).
• Division B: Supports Program Executive Office Command Control Communications and Network (PEO C3N).
• Division C: Supports Program Executive Office-Intelligence, Electronic Warfare & Sensors (PEO IEW&S) and Program Executive Office - Missiles and Space (PEO MS).
• Division D: Supports Program Executive Office (PEO) Soldier, Army Test and Evaluation Command (ATEC), Headquarters Department of the Army (HQDA), Foreign Military Sales (FMS), and PEO Enterprise Information Systems (PEO EIS).
• Installation and Technology Division: Supports Installation Management Command (IMCOM), APG Garrison, DEVCOM – Chemical Biological Center (CBC), U.S. Army Communications-Electronics Command (CECOM), Aberdeen Test Center (ATC), and Software License Agreements.
• DC30E Division: Supports reimagining contracting for digital requirements, focusing on building expertise, collaboration, training, scaling, and institutionalizing modern software development practices.

This document provides potential bidders with an overview of the types of organizations and areas where contracting opportunities may arise within the ACC-APG. It helps vendors identify which divisions might be relevant to their capabilities and interests for future solicitations.

Other / Unclassified

This document is an "Industry Alert" announcing that the MAPS acquisition will proceed. It also serves as an invitation to an upcoming ACC-APG event: an "Industry Update | MAPS Pre-Solicitation Walk-Through."

This alert informs potential bidders that the MAPS acquisition is moving forward and provides details for an event where they can learn more about it. The event details include:

• Date: Wednesday, 28 January, 2026
• Location: Myer Auditorium, 6555 Surveillance Loop (BLDG 6000), APG, MD 21005
• Check-in: Starts at 7:45 am
• Event Time: 8:30 am - 12:30 pm

Instructions are provided on how to register for the event, both in-person and virtually, with a limit of two representatives per company for in-person attendance. A link to the SAM.gov posting is also provided for further information.