One Acquisition Solution for Integrated Services Plus (OASIS+) Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) Set-Aside Continuously Open Solicitation

Amendment / Modification

This document, Amendment 0008, provides the OASIS+ Domain Qualifications Matrices and Scorecards. It details the specific qualification thresholds and credit allocation for various domains within the OASIS+ contract vehicle. Key changes and information include:

• Basis of Award: Each OASIS+ Domain has a corresponding Qualifications Matrix and threshold to ensure minimum standards. The qualification threshold for small business and socioeconomic set-asides is 36 out of 50 credits, while the Unrestricted (UR) threshold is 42 out of 50 credits (45 for Enterprise Solutions Domain).
• Instructions for Use: The workbook contains matrices/scorecards for each Domain, referencing RFP Sections L (Instructions to Offerors) and M (Evaluation Factors). Tabs are marked "SB/SE" for Small Business/Socioeconomic or "UNR" for Unrestricted.
• Proposal Submission: For offers including multiple Domains, specific items (Sections L.5.2 through L.5.6) must be included in each Domain proposal submission. The Submission Portal allows for asset application across Domains.
• Qualification Thresholds: Offerors have discretion in using qualifications to meet thresholds, but failure to demonstrate a qualification results in no credit.
• Mentor-Protégé Joint Ventures (MP-JVs): Specific reduced thresholds apply for Qualifying Projects (QPs) and Federal Experience Projects (FEPs) submitted in the name of the protégé.

This document provides detailed matrices and scorecards for multiple domains (M&A, T&E, R&D, INTEL, ENT, ENV, FAC, LOG, FS, HC, BA, M&PR, SS), outlining qualification criteria and credit points for both Small Business/Socioeconomic and Unrestricted contract types. It references RFP Sections L and M.

This document directly impacts proposal preparation by defining the specific qualifications and experience required to meet the thresholds for each OASIS+ Domain. Offerors must carefully review the matrices relevant to the Domains they intend to bid on to ensure their proposals meet the stated criteria.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document contains questionnaires related to Cybersecurity and Supply Chain Risk Management (C-SCRM) for potential bidders. It includes instructions for completing the questionnaires and definitions of key terms.

• Pre-Award Evaluation Instructions: Provides guidance on completing the Basic Safeguarding of Covered Contractor Information Systems Questionnaire, including contact information requirements and definitions for terms like 'Covered contractor information system' and 'Federal contract information'.
• Pre-Award Eval. - Basic Safeguarding Questionnaire: A questionnaire with sections on Contact Information, Access Control, Identification and Authentication, Media Protection, Physical Protection, System and Communications Protection, and System and Information Integrity. Bidders are expected to provide responses to these questions.
• Post-Award Deliverable Instructions: Outlines the purpose of the Cyber-Supply Chain Risk Management (C-SCRM) Plan, emphasizing the need for vigilant SCRM procedures to evaluate a contractor's SCRM maturity. It provides instructions for template completion, including contact information, response format, and the importance of attaching supporting documents.
• Post-Award Deliverable - C-SCRM Plan Template: A detailed template covering seven sections: Supply Chain Provenance, Supply Chain Management and Supplier Governance, Information Security, Physical Security, Personnel Security, Supply Chain Integrity, and Supply Chain Resilience. Each section contains specific questions and requirements related to a contractor's SCRM practices, often referencing NIST standards.

This document is critical for bidders to understand and address the cybersecurity and supply chain risk management requirements of the opportunity. Completing the provided questionnaires and templates accurately will be necessary for proposal submission and evaluation, demonstrating compliance with government standards for safeguarding information systems and managing supply chain risks.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document, "J.P-8 Direct Labor Hourly Rate Ranges (Amd 0008).xlsx", provides the direct labor hourly rate ranges for various Subject Matter Expert (SME) labor categories. It is an attachment in support of the OASIS+ solicitation and references RFP Section L.5.7 for further information.

• Labor Categories: Lists specific OASIS+ labor category titles and their corresponding SOC Numbers.
• Hourly Rate Ranges: Provides a "LOW" and "HIGH" dollar amount for each labor category, representing the acceptable hourly rate range.

This attachment is crucial for bidders to understand the expected direct labor costs for SME roles as defined by the solicitation. Bidders should use these ranges when developing their pricing proposals to ensure compliance with the solicitation's requirements as outlined in Section L.5.7.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document, "ATTACHMENT J.P-2 Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) SAMPLE," provides a sample of an FPDS report and instructions for bidders on how to use it to verify project experience as required by Section L.5.2.3.1 of the OASIS+ RFP. It details the steps to access and interpret FPDS reports and includes a crosswalk table mapping elements within the OSP (Offeror's Proposal) to corresponding data fields in FPDS for verification.

• Instructions for accessing FPDS (www.fpds.gov).
• Guidance on searching for projects using contract numbers, task order numbers, contractor names, or UEI/DUNS numbers.
• Explanation of how to view contract action details.
• Samples of correct FPDS report types are provided on pages 3-7.
• A crosswalk table on page 2 details how specific OSP elements (e.g., Prime Contractor, Contract Number, Period of Performance, Total Contract Value, NAICS Code) correspond to FPDS data fields.
• Information on alternative verification methods if FPDS reports are unavailable or insufficient.

This attachment is crucial for bidders to understand how to document and verify their past project experience to meet the requirements of the OASIS+ RFP. It guides them on extracting relevant data from FPDS to support their proposals, ensuring compliance with Sections L.5.2 and L.5.3 regarding qualifying project experience.

Amendment / Modification

This amendment (0008) re-opens the OASIS+ RFP continuously and incorporates several changes, including the Revolutionary FAR Overhaul (RFO) and minor language clarifications. Key updates include:

• RFO Incorporation: References to the Revolutionary FAR Overhaul are incorporated throughout the RFP.
• Submission Notifications: Replaced requirements for updating information via OASIS+ Submission Portal (OSP) with FedConnect notifications.
• Domains: Increased the number of Domains from seven to twelve and added new sections for these domains.
• Minimum Contract Guarantee: Provided clarification on the circumstances under which the Minimum Guaranteed Award amount will be paid.
• Contracting Vehicle Terms: Revised language regarding Blanket Purchase Agreements (BPAs), Multiyear Contracting, and Options, clarifying that OASIS+ supports both commercial and non-commercial requirements and does not allow agreements identified in FAR subpart 16.7.
• Eligibility and Fair Opportunity: Clarified that contractors compete for task orders within awarded CLINs (NAICS Codes) corresponding to their specific fair opportunity pools. Fair opportunity is managed in eBuy. Contractors will only be included in CLINs where they (or their team) represent as a small business for the corresponding size standard. Offerors must represent their size status for each NAICS Code within their proposed Domain(s) during initial proposal submission.
• Socioeconomic Certification: Updated requirements for socioeconomic certification, mandating that an Offeror's SAM.gov record must reflect SBA certification at the time of offer to be eligible for award.
• Teaming Arrangements: Clarified requirements for Contractor Teaming Arrangements (CTAs), including notification of changes to CTA documentation and team member size representation.
• Qualifying Projects (QPs): Updated requirements for QPs, including that for SDVOSB IDIQ awards, a minimum of two QPs must be from an SBA-certified SDVOSB concern for each proposed Domain. For SBA Mentor-Protégé joint ventures, at least one QP must be from the protégé or the offering Mentor-Protégé joint venture.
• Pricing and Rates: Revised language regarding cost/price templates, indirect rates, and sole-source T&M/LH ceiling rates, including escalation factors.
• Attachments and Forms: Numerous attachments and forms have been updated, added, or revised to reflect new domains, requirements, and clarifications.

Significant changes have been made across various sections, including B (Contract Administration), C (Scope of Work), F (Deliverables and Compliance), G (Contract Management), H (Special Contract Requirements), J (Attachments and Forms), K (Representations and Certifications), L (Proposal Preparation), and M (Evaluation Factors).

Proposal submission capability will go live in the OASIS+ Submission Portal (OSP) on January 12, 2026. Offerors must acknowledge this amendment as part of their offer submission. The RFP is now open continuously. The Revolutionary FAR Overhaul updates apply to the FAR, and in case of conflict, the FAR prevails over GSAR/M text.

Amendment / Modification

This document is Amendment 0008 to the Request for Proposal (RFP) No. 47QRCA23R0004 for the OASIS+ MAC Program, Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) IDIQ. The amendment was issued on January 12, 2026. The solicitation is current as of FAC:2025-06, dated 10/01/2025.

This amendment does not appear to modify specific sections of the original RFP. It serves as an update to the solicitation.

This amendment does not appear to alter proposal deadlines, requirements, or evaluation factors. It is an administrative update to the solicitation.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document, Attachment J-1, defines the OASIS+ labor categories and their alignment with the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Standard Occupational Classifications (SOC). It provides definitions for various labor categories to be used in task order pricing and reporting.

• General Alignment: OASIS+ labor categories align with the OMB Standard Occupational Classification Manual and the BLS SOC system.
• Labor Category Definitions:
  • Junior: Applies fundamental concepts, requires practical experience and training, works under supervision. Generally up to 3 years of relevant experience.
  • Journeyman: Possesses expertise on complex assignments, requires originality and innovation, operates with appreciable latitude. Generally 3 to 10 years of relevant experience.
  • Senior: Possesses comprehensive knowledge, plans and leads major assignments, functions as a technical expert. Generally over 10 years of relevant experience.
  • Subject Matter Expert (SME): Provides technical/management leadership, establishes goals, has domain and expert technical knowledge, may supervise. Qualifications are exceptional and/or highly unique, identified as industry leaders.
• Deviations: Contractors may deviate from these definitions in task order proposals, provided deviations are clearly identified.
• Reporting: While not required for use by the Ordering Activity, contractors must map all labor categories subject to task order reporting to these standardized categories for reporting awarded rates and prices.

This document is crucial for bidders to understand how labor categories will be defined and reported for task orders under the OASIS+ contract. It provides a framework for pricing proposals and ensures consistent reporting of labor costs and rates. Bidders should pay close attention to these definitions when developing their task order proposals and understand the flexibility for deviations.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document, Attachment J-2, outlines the requirements for reporting transactional data and Contract Access Fee (CAF) for task orders issued under the Master Contract. It details the specific data elements that contractors must report in the Government designated system, ensuring accurate tracking of orders, costs, modifications, and invoices.

• Task Order Reporting Data: Defines essential elements such as Contract Number, OASIS+ IDIQ CLIN, Delivery/Task Order Number (PIID), Award Date, Description of Deliverable, Predominant Contract Type, Performance Based Contract indicator, GSA Assisted Services indicator, Issuing Agency & Bureau, Receiving Agency/Bureau, Non-Federal Entity, Ordering Contracting Officer Name, Period of Performance, Ultimate Completion Date, Initial Obligated/Funded Amount, Total Obligated/Funded Amount, and Total Estimated Value.
• Modification Reporting: Includes fields for Modification Number, Award Date, Type, Description, Obligated/Funded Amount, and Period of Performance.
• Invoice Reporting: Details required information for invoices, including Reporting Period, Paid Date, Amount, Contract Line Item Number (CLIN), Line Item Identifier, Line Item Type, Quantity of Item Sold, Unit of Measure, Price Paid Per Unit, and Total Price.
• Contract Access Fee (CAF) Reporting: Specifies fields for CAF Line Item Amount, Voucher Number, Remit Payment Date, Total CAF Payment Amount, and Amount Allocated.
• Subcontracting Data: Requires reporting of Subcontractor Name(s), Unique Entity Identifier(s), Total Amount Subcontracted for Services, and Similarly Situated Entity Identification.
• Services Data: Includes Services-Type of Work Performed, Place of Performance, Employee Security Clearance Level, Applicable Labor Law, Employee Location, Labor Category, and Indirect Costs.
• OASIS+ CLIN Structure: Provides a table mapping OASIS+ Reporting CLINs to Reporting Line Types (e.g., Labor Categories, Cost Reimbursement Services, Fixed Price Services, Materials and Other Direct Costs, Travel, Indirect Costs, Contract Access Fee).

This attachment is crucial for bidders as it dictates the reporting obligations for any task orders awarded under the Master Contract. Understanding these requirements is essential for accurate invoicing, financial tracking, and compliance with government reporting standards, particularly concerning transactional data and contract access fees. It also clarifies the structure for CLINs within the OASIS+ program, aiding in proposal preparation and contract management.

Attachment / Provisions and Clauses

This document, Attachment J-4, outlines the Department of Defense (DOD) Required Provisions and Clauses for Task Orders issued under a Master Contract. It serves to inform potential bidders about the specific regulatory and contractual requirements that will apply to task orders solicited and issued under this master agreement.

This attachment lists numerous DFARS (Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement) provisions and clauses that are incorporated by reference. These cover a wide range of topics, including:

• Representations and Certifications: Requirements related to compensation of former DOD officials, safeguarding covered defense information, foreign government ownership or control, organizational conflicts of interest, and trade agreements.
• Contract Performance: Provisions concerning time-and-materials/labor-hour proposals, performance outside the United States, trade agreements, and earned value management systems.
• Technical Data and Software: Clauses related to rights in technical data, computer software, and identification/assertion of restrictions.
• Personnel and Operations: Provisions addressing contractor personnel supporting U.S. Armed Forces deployed outside the United States, including definitions, general requirements, compliance with laws, preliminary personnel requirements, and specific policies for CAAF (Contractors Authorized to Accompany the Force) and non-CAAF.
• Antiterrorism and Force Protection: Policies for defense contractors operating outside the United States.
• Small Business Subcontracting: Requirements for small business subcontracting plans.

FAR 52.215-8, Order of Precedence-Uniform Contract Format, is applicable. In case of conflict between task order terms and conditions and Master Contract terms and conditions, the Master Contract terms take precedence.

Offerors are required to complete and return specific provisions and certifications with their Task Order proposals. This includes annual representations and certifications electronically via the SAM.gov website, with specific instructions for substitutions or updates. Failure to submit required documentation may render an offer ineligible for award.

Updates to these required clauses may be executed on the Master Contract via a unilateral contract modification. Bidders are advised to review the latest DFARS found on acquisition.gov.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document, "Attachment J-5 OASIS+ Task Order Clause and Provision Matrix," serves as a comprehensive matrix to assist Ordering Contracting Officers (OCOs) and OASIS+ Contractors in identifying applicable clauses and provisions at the Task Order level. It is current as of FAC: 2025-06, dated 10/01/2025, and includes references to the Revolutionary FAR Overhaul (RFO) by Deviation.

• Purpose and Use: To aid OCOs and contractors in determining task order-level clauses and provisions.
• Incorporated Provisions: Lists FAR provisions applicable at the Task Order level, categorized by contract type (FP, CR, TM, SB, UR), with dates and applicability.
• Incorporated Clauses: Details FAR clauses incorporated by reference, including those related to Inspection and Acceptance (Section E), Deliveries or Performance (Section F), and Contract Clauses (Section I).
• Agency-Specific Clauses: Includes sections for Department of Defense (DoD) and Department of Labor (DoL) agency-specific required provisions and clauses.
• Deviations: Notes numerous provisions and clauses that are subject to deviations, particularly "(DEVIATION NOV 2025)".

This matrix is crucial for bidders as it outlines the specific FAR clauses and provisions that will likely be incorporated into individual Task Orders issued under the OASIS+ contract. Understanding these clauses is essential for accurately preparing proposals, understanding contractual obligations, and ensuring compliance. Bidders should pay close attention to the dates, any noted deviations, and the applicability to different contract types (Fixed Price, Cost Reimbursement, Time-and-Materials/Labor-Hour, Small Business, Unrestricted) to fully assess the requirements and potential impacts on their bids.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document, "PROJECT VERIFICATION FORM (Current as of AMD 0008)", is an attachment (J.P-3) used to verify project experience for Offerors responding to a solicitation. It is applicable for verifying Customer (Federal and Non-Federal) Project experience, Joint Venture (JV) project experience, and Multiple Award Schedule Contractor Teaming Arrangement (MAS CTA) project experience.

• Part I: Offeror Information: Collects details about the Offeror, including name and UEID, and JV/MRCL details if applicable.
• Part II: Project Identification: Requires contractor name, contract number, project name, funding agency/customer, period of performance, total contract value, and NAICS/PSC code for the claimed project.
• Domain Relevance: Sections for detailing relevance to proposed Domains, including narrative explanations and quantitative data on QP minimum average annual dollar value and average annual value of relevant work.
• Part III: Project Qualifications: A checklist for Offerors to indicate which specific qualifications they meet, categorized by Integrated, Management & Staffing, Scale (All Offerors and Protégé Offerors), Specialized Functional Experience, Multiple & OCONUS Locations, Federal Experience (Competition, Cost-Reimbursement, Advanced R&D).
• Part IV: Customer Certification: Section for the customer (Contracting Officer or Corporate Official) to certify the Offeror's claimed project experience.
• Part V: Joint Venture Certification: For JV members to certify the Contractor's performance.
• Part VI: MAS CTA Member Certification: For MAS CTA members to certify the Contractor's performance.

Bidders must complete and submit this form to substantiate their claimed project experience as required by the solicitation (Sections L.5.2 and L.5.3). The form requires detailed information about past projects and how they align with the solicitation's requirements and proposed domains. The customer's certification in Part IV is crucial for validating the claimed experience.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This Excel workbook, "J.P-4 Domain Auto-Relevant NAICS Codes and PSCs (Amd 0008).xlsx", provides a comprehensive list of North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes and Product and Service Codes (PSCs) that are considered "auto-relevant" for various domains. This information is crucial for bidders to understand how their project experience can be used to claim evaluation credit under the "Relevance" qualification factor for task orders issued under MA-IDIQ contracts.

• Instructions Sheet: Outlines the purpose of the workbook and provides important notes regarding the verification of NAICS codes for task orders under Multiple Award Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (MA-IDIQ) contracts. It details specific requirements for submitting supporting documentation when the IDIQ's assigned NAICS code is not automatically applicable to the task order.
• Domain-Specific Sheets (Technical & Engineering, Management & Advisory, Intelligence, Research & Development, Enterprise Solutions, Facilities, Environmental Services, Logistics, Business Administration, Social Services, Financial Services, Human Capital): Each sheet lists auto-relevant NAICS codes and/or PSCs associated with specific domains. This allows bidders to identify which codes align with their past performance.
• Automatic Relevance Verification: Explains that Offerors can submit project experience for automatic relevance consideration if the assigned NAICS or PSC matches an entry in this workbook. It also specifies that non-federal projects and federal subcontracts are ineligible for automatic relevance and require standard verification.

This document is essential for bidders to accurately map their past performance to the requirements of the opportunity. By referencing the auto-relevant NAICS codes and PSCs listed for each domain, bidders can strategically present their experience to maximize their chances of receiving evaluation credit for "Relevance," a key qualification factor. It also clarifies the documentation needed to support claims of relevance, particularly for task orders under MA-IDIQ contracts.

Amendment / Modification

This document is Amendment 0008 to Attachment J.P-5, which details functional areas and sub-areas for claiming "Integrated Experience" credit in accordance with solicitation Section L.5.2.3.3.

• The amendment updates the list of functional areas and sub-areas. It clarifies that, with the exception of "Enterprise Solutions," each Domain is considered a distinct functional area as detailed in Section 1 of the document.
• Additional functional areas are detailed in Section 2 of this document.
• It references solicitation Section C.5 for Services Not in Scope.

This amendment provides clarification on how functional areas and sub-areas are defined for evaluation purposes. Bidders should review these updated definitions to ensure accurate claims for "Integrated Experience."

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document is the "Past Performance Rating Form" (Attachment J.P-6), used to evaluate an offeror's past performance on previous contracts. It is intended to be completed by a "Rater" (e.g., Contracting Officer, COR, or customer representative) to provide an assessment of the contractor's performance.

The form requires information on:

• Past Performance Project Identification: Contractor Name, Contract Number, Project Title, Project Value, and Total Period of Performance.
• Past Performance Reference Information: Rater's Name, Title, Agency/Customer, Phone, E-mail, and Signature.
• Performance Criteria Ratings: The form includes sections to rate performance in five areas:
  1. Technical (Quality of Service)
  2. Cost Control
  3. Schedule/Timeliness
  4. Management or Business Relations
  5. Small Business Subcontracting (Only applicable to Federal Prime Contract Awards)
  6. Other (as applicable) For each criterion, raters select an Adjectival Rating (Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, Unsatisfactory, or Not Applicable) and provide definitions for each rating. Additional comments can be added for each section.

This form is crucial for bidders as it outlines the specific criteria and rating scale used by the government to evaluate their past performance. Understanding these criteria will help offerors prepare their proposals and potentially gather relevant past performance information to support their bids. The "Small Business Subcontracting" section is specifically noted as applicable to Federal Prime Contract Awards, indicating its importance for prime contractors.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document, "ATTACHMENT J.P-7 CTA Qualifications & MRCL List Template," provides a template for offerors to document their Contractor Teaming Arrangements (CTA) and Meaningful Relationship Commitments (MRCL) for proposals submitted under OASIS+ contract families. It is intended to ensure transparency regarding team composition and capabilities.

• Section A: Collects information on Joint Venture (JV) entities, including the entity name, work done, and qualifications. An example is provided.
• Section B: Documents CTA subcontractor team members. It requires the Offering Entity Legal Name, SAM UEID, Solicitation Number, Contract Name, and Signature of Authorized Rep. It also includes a table to list Proposed Subcontractor Legal Name, SAM UEID, and Business Size at Time of Proposal Submission.
• Section C: Documents Meaningful Relationship Commitments (MRCL). It requires similar information as Section B, along with a table to list MRCL Entity Legal Name, SAM UEID, Project(s), and Certifications/Systems/Resources Claimed. An example is provided.

Bidders must use this template to detail their proposed teaming partners, their qualifications, and their commitments. This information is crucial for demonstrating compliance with solicitation requirements related to teaming and subcontracting, particularly for Joint Venture Offerors and those forming CTAs. The details provided in this attachment will be included in the contract file upon award.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document, "J.P-9 Cost-Price Template (Amd 0008).xlsx", is a cost/price template provided as an attachment to support the OASIS+ solicitation. It is intended for offerors to input their cost and pricing information.

• Instructions: Section L.5.7.2 of the RFP provides detailed instructions for completing this template. Offerors are advised to review Sections L and M of the RFP thoroughly.
• Offeror Information: Fields are included for the Official Legal Offering Entity Name and SAM UEID.
• Indirect Cost Pools: The template allows for the entry of Fringe Benefits, Overhead, and G&A indirect cost pools. Offerors can edit pre-populated names and add up to ten additional indirect cost pools if their rate structure differs. Indirect rate percentages must be entered, rounded to two decimal places.
• Direct Labor Rates: Offerors must enter direct labor rates for 20 labor categories, rounded to two decimal places.
• Formulas: The template includes pre-populated formulas for calculating Fringe Benefits, Overhead, G&A, and Profit based on direct labor and specified allocation bases. Offerors with different indirect rate structures can edit these formulas.
• Escalation: A fixed escalation factor of 4.41% is embedded for automatic calculation of sole source T&M/LH ceiling rates for Years 1 through 15. Offerors are not permitted to change this factor.
• Compatibility: Caution is advised against adding/deleting rows/columns or converting the file format, as this may affect compatibility with the OASIS+ Submission Portal (OSP) pricing module.

This template is critical for bidders to accurately calculate and submit their proposed pricing in accordance with the solicitation requirements. Understanding the instructions for indirect cost pools, direct labor rates, and the pre-defined formulas and escalation factors is essential for a compliant proposal submission.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document is a template for a Subcontractor Letter of Commitment, intended for use with the OASIS+ Multi-Agency Contract (MAC). It serves as a formal commitment from a proposed subcontractor to a prime contractor, outlining the terms under which the subcontractor will provide services if the prime contractor is awarded a Task Order under the OASIS+ contract.

• Statement of Commitment: Details the agreement for the subcontractor to provide services within specific domains (e.g., Intelligence, Engineering, Logistics) as determined at the Task Order level. The agreement's validity is tied to the OASIS+ contract's period of performance.
• Authorization to Use Past Performance: Grants the prime contractor permission to include the subcontractor's project experience and past performance in their OASIS+ proposal.
• Limitations on Subcontracting: Acknowledges the requirements of FAR 52.219-14, particularly for small business concerns, regarding the percentage of contract performance that can be subcontracted to non-similarly situated entities.
• Legal Information: Fields for the Prime Contractor's and Proposed Subcontractor's legal names and Unique Entity IDs (UEIDs) from SAM.gov.
• Subcontractor Representative Information: Contact details for the subcontractor's representative.
• Authorized Signature: A section for the subcontractor's authorized representative to sign, confirming their commitment.

Potential prime contractors should use this template to secure commitments from their proposed subcontractors. Subcontractors can use this to formally express their intent to provide services and allow their past performance to be cited. It helps ensure compliance with subcontracting limitations and provides necessary information for proposal submissions.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document is the "J.P-13 Financial Data Input Template" and serves as an attachment to the OASIS+ solicitation. It is used by offerors to input their financial data for evaluation.

• Offeror Information: Fields for Offeror Name, Offeror SAM UEID, JV Team Member Name (if applicable), and Entity SAM UEID.
• Financial Categories: Sections for Current Assets, PPE, Other Assets, Total Assets, Current Liabilities, Other Liabilities, Total Liabilities, Net Sales, and Net Income.
• Data Input: Requires financial information to be entered by year for three years (Year 1 oldest, Year 3 latest).
• Instructions:
  • Offerors must input financial information from their associated financial statements for the required previous three years, as per Solicitation Section L.5.8.3. Data will be verified against submitted statements.
  • Unpopulated joint ventures must submit a separate J.P-13 template for each JV member, mentor, and/or protégé, as per Solicitation Section L.5.1.3.1.

This template is crucial for bidders to accurately report their historical financial performance as required by the solicitation. Proper completion and submission are necessary for proposal evaluation.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document is a "J.P-14 Lateral Springboarding Summary Sheet" that current OASIS+ contract holders must complete to request lateral springboarding under Section H.11.2. It serves as a standardized form to document a contractor's qualifications and experience for specific solicitations.

• Contractor Information: Fields for Contractor Legal Name, SAM UEID, Existing Contract No., and Requested Solicitation(s).
• Experience Documentation: Requires detailing relevant experience and identifying a minimum of two Qualifying Projects (QPs) performed by an SBA-certified concern for the applicable socioeconomic program, as per Solicitation Section C.1.2.
• Team Composition: Contractors are restricted to using only team members already listed on their existing OASIS+ contract.
• Qualification Restriction: Submissions cannot include new or additional QPs beyond those presented in the original proposal to meet requirements in Solicitation Section L.5.2.2.
• Qualifying Project Table: A table to list details of Qualifying Projects, including Project Title, Entity Awarded, SAM UEID, and SBA-Certified Categories.

OASIS+ contract holders must complete and submit this form to be considered for lateral springboarding opportunities. It dictates the specific experience and team composition requirements that must be met and documented for eligibility.