One Acquisition Solution for Integrated Services Plus (OASIS+) Total Small Business Set-Aside Continuously Open

Solicitation / RFP / RFQ

This document is a Solicitation, Offer, and Award form (Standard Form 33) for a procurement by the General Services Administration/FAS/PSHC. It outlines the terms for soliciting offers, receiving bids, and making an award for supplies or services.

The solicitation includes sections covering:

• Solicitation/Contract Form

• Supplies or Services and Prices/Costs

• Description/Specifications/Work Statement

• Packaging and Marking

• Inspection and Acceptance

• Deliveries or Performance

• Contract Administration Data

• Special Contract Requirements

• Contract Clauses

• List of Documents, Exhibits, and Other Attachments

• Representations, Certifications, and Other Statements of Offerors

• Instructions, Conditions, and Notices to Offerors

• Evaluation Factors for Award

• The solicitation number is 47QRCA23R0001.

• The date issued is June 15, 2023.

• Offers are valid for 365 calendar days (or a different period if inserted by the offeror).

• Offers must be submitted to the address specified in item 8.

• The solicitation details evaluation factors for award.

• The type of solicitation is indicated as "SEALED BID (IFB)" and "REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL".

• It references "OPEN COMPETITION" under 10 U.S.C. 3204(a) and 41 U.S.C. 3304(a).

• The document includes sections for acknowledgments of amendments and discount for prompt payment.

• It also contains sections for the award to be completed by the Government, including the contracting officer's signature and award date.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document, "Attachment J-1 OASIS+ LABOR CATEGORIES and BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS STANDARD OCCUPATIONAL CLASSIFICATIONS," defines the labor categories used for the OASIS+ contract vehicle. It aligns these categories with the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system. This attachment is crucial for understanding how labor will be categorized and potentially priced for task orders issued under the OASIS+ contract.

• OASIS+ Labor Categories: Aligned with the OMB Standard Occupational Classification Manual and BLS data.
• Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) System: A federal standard used to classify workers.
• Labor Category Definitions: Defines "Junior," "Journeyman," and "Senior" based on duties, responsibilities, and expected years of experience (up to 3 years for Junior, 3-10 for Journeyman, over 10 for Senior).
• Subject Matter Expert (SME): Defined as an individual with exceptional/unique qualifications and recognized industry leadership, not necessarily tied to specific years of experience.
• BLS SOC Updates: Contractors are responsible for incorporating updated BLS SOC systems during the period of performance.
• Deviations: Contractors may deviate from these definitions in task order proposals, provided deviations are clearly identified.
• Reporting: Contractors must map all task order labor categories to these standardized categories for reporting purposes in the Sales Reporting Portal.

Bidders responding to task orders under the OASIS+ contract must understand these labor category definitions. They will need to map their proposed personnel to these categories for pricing and reporting. The document also clarifies that contractors can propose deviations, but these must be explicitly stated. The definitions of Junior, Journeyman, Senior, and SME will inform how bidders structure their teams and present their qualifications.

Amendment / Modification

This document is Amendment 0008 to the OASIS+ MAC Program Small Business IDIQ Request for Proposal (RFP No. 47QRCA23R0001).

This amendment does not appear to modify specific sections of the original solicitation but rather updates the solicitation to its current status as of Amendment 0008, dated January 12, 2026. The solicitation is current as of FAC:2025-06, dated 10/01/2025.

No changes to proposal deadlines or submission requirements are indicated in this amendment. Bidders should refer to the original solicitation for these details.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document is a summary sheet for contractors to request lateral springboarding under Section H.11.2 of the OASIS+ contract. It is intended for current OASIS+ contract holders.

• Contractor Legal Name
• SAM UEID
• Existing Contract No.
• Requested Solicitation(s)
• Signature of Contractor's Authorized Representative
• Experience Documentation: Must detail relevant experience and identify a minimum of two Qualifying Projects (QPs) performed by an SBA-certified concern for the applicable socioeconomic program.
• Team Composition Limit: Contractors must use only team members already listed on their existing OASIS+ contract.
• Qualification Restriction: Submissions cannot include new or additional QPs beyond those in the original proposal.
• A table to list Qualifying Projects, including Contract/Order No. - Project Title, Entity Awarded, SAM UEID, and SBA-Certified Categories.

This form is required for OASIS+ contract holders seeking to request lateral springboarding. Bidders must accurately complete all sections, providing details on their experience, team composition, and qualifying projects to meet the requirements of the requested solicitation.

Amendment / Modification

This document, Attachment J-4, provides Department of Defense (DoD) Required Provisions and Clauses for Task Orders. It is noted that this matrix is based on the DFARS latest changes as of 11/10/2025, and it is recommended to review the latest DFARS found on acquisition.gov/dfars. The document outlines provisions and clauses incorporated by reference, including DFARS provisions related to:

• Representation Relating to Compensation of Former DOD Officials
• Compliance with Safeguarding Covered Defense Information Controls
• Disclosure of Ownership or Control by a Foreign Government
• Notice of Prohibition Relating to Organizational Conflict of Interest – Major Defense Acquisition Program
• Only One Offer
• Alternate A, Time-and-Materials/Labor-Hour Proposal Requirements – Non-Commercial Item Acquisition with Adequate Price Competition
• Report of Intended Performance Outside the United States and Canada—Submission with Offer
• Trade Agreements Certificate-Basic
• Secondary Arab Boycott of Israel
• Buy America Act- Free Trade Agreements – Balance of Payment Program Certificate
• Notice of Earned Value Management System

It also details full text provisions/representations and certifications that offerors must complete and return, such as DFARS 252.204-7007, Alternate A, Annual Representations and Certifications (OCT 2025), and various other DFARS provisions and clauses related to:

• Felony Criminal Violation
• Unpaid Delinquent Tax Liability
• Offering Property for Exchange
• Identification and Assertion of Use, Release, or Disclosure Restrictions
• Technical Data or Computer Software Previously Delivered to the Government
• Notice of Warranty Tracking of Serialized Items
• Contracting Officer's Representative
• Requirements Relating to Compensation of Former DoD Officials
• Prohibition on Persons Convicted of Fraud or Other Defense-Contract-Related Felonies
• Requirement to Inform Employees of Whistleblower Rights
• Agency Office of the Inspector General
• Display of Hotline Posters
• Disclosure of Information
• Payment for Contract Line or Subline Items Not Separately Priced
• Control of Government Personnel Work Product
• Antiterrorism Awareness Training for Contractors
• Billing Instructions-Cost Vouchers
• Safeguarding Covered Defense Information and Cyber Incident Reporting
• Notice of Authorized Disclosure of Information for Litigation Support
• Provision of Information to Cooperative Agreement Holders
• Subcontracting with Firms that are Owned or Controlled by the Government of a Country that is a State Sponsor of Terrorism
• Prohibited Financial Interests for Lead System Integrators
• Organizational Conflict of Interest-Major Defense Acquisition Program
• Item Unique Identification and Valuation
• Use of Government-Assigned Serial Numbers
• Cost Estimating System Requirements
• Proposal Adequacy Checklist
• Award Fee Reduction or Denial for Jeopardizing the Health or Safety of Government Personnel
• Allowability of Legal Costs Incurred in Connection With a Whistleblower Proceeding
• Surge Option
• Small Business Subcontracting Plan (DOD Contracts)-Basic
• Alternate I and II
• Notification to Delay Performance
• Compliance with Local Labor Laws (Overseas)
• Restrictions on the Use of Mandatory Arbitration Agreements
• Prohibition on Storage, Treatment, and Disposal of Toxic or Hazardous Materials-Basic
• Prohibition of Hexavalent Chromium
• Buy American - Balance of Payments Program Certificate-Basic
• Qualifying Country Sources As Subcontractors
• Report of Intended Performance Outside the United States and Canada—Submission after Award
• Identification of Expenditures in the United States
• Preference for Certain Domestic Commodities
• Duty-Free Entry
• Trade Agreements - Basic
• Export Controlled Items
• Utilization of Indian Organizations, Indian-Owned Economic Enterprises, and Native Hawaiian Small Business Concerns
• Rights In Technical Data-Other than Commercial Products and Commercial Services
• Rights In Other Than Commercial Computer Software and Other Than Commercial Computer Software Documentation
• Technical Data-Commercial Products and Commercial Services
• Rights in Bid or Proposal Information
• Validation of Asserted Restrictions-Computer Software
• Rights In Special Works
• Limitations on the Use or Disclosure of Government-Furnished Information Marked with Restrictive Legends
• Deferred Ordering Of Technical Data or Computer Software
• Technical Data – Withholding of Payment
• Validation of Asserted Restrictions on Technical Data
• Supplemental Cost Principles
• Electronic Submission of Payment Requests and Receiving Reports
• Wide Area Workflow Payment Instructions
• Limitation of Government's Obligation
• Levies on Contract Payments
• Protection Against Compromising Emanations
• Information Assurance Contractor Training and Certification
• Supply Chain Risk
• Material Management and Accounting System
• Contractor Business Systems
• Accounting System Administration
• Pricing of Contract Modifications
• Requests for Equitable Adjustment
• Subcontracts for Commercial Products or Commercial Services (DOD Contracts)
• Contractor Purchasing System Administration-Basic
• Contractor Property Management System Administration
• Warranty of Data - Basic
• Alternate I
• Alternate II
• Notification of Potential Safety Issues
• Safety of Facilities, Infrastructure, and Equipment for Military Operations
• Warranty Tracking of Serialized Items
• Contractor Counterfeit Electronic Part Detection and Avoidance System
• Sources of Electronic Parts
• Pass-Through of Motor Carrier Fuel Surcharge Adjustment to the Cost Bearer
• Transportation of Supplies by Sea – Basic
• Notification of Anticipated Contract Termination or Reduction
• Ordering From Government Supply Sources
• DFARS 252.219-7003, Small Business Subcontracting Plan (DOD Contracts) – Basic (DEC 2019)
• DFARS 252.222-7000, Restrictions on Employment of Personnel (MAR 2000)
• DFARS 252.225-7040, Contractor Personnel Supporting U.S. Armed Forces Deployed Outside the United States (OCT 2023)
• DFARS 252.225-7043, Antiterrorism/Force Protection Policy for Defense Contractors Outside the United States (JUN 2015)

This document is an attachment that lists numerous DFARS provisions and clauses. It is presented as a matrix with dates and applicability indicators (FP, CR, TM, SB, UR). Several sections are presented in full text, including DFARS 252.219-7003, DFARS 252.222-7000, DFARS 252.225-7040, and DFARS 252.225-7043.

This document details required provisions and clauses that offerors must address in their proposals. It also provides guidance on representations and certifications that need to be completed or verified via the SAM database. Specific instructions are given for completing DFARS 252.204-7007, Alternate A, Annual Representations and Certifications. Failure to submit required information may render an offer ineligible for award.

Amendment / Modification

This amendment (0008) re-opens the OASIS+ RFP and incorporates changes, including the Revolutionary FAR Overhaul. Offerors must acknowledge this amendment in their submission.

Key changes include:

• Revolutionary FAR Overhaul (RFO): Incorporated RFO references and related language clarifications throughout the RFP.
• Notifications: Changed contractor information update notifications from OASIS+ Submission Portal (OSP) to FedConnect.
• Domains: Increased the number of Domains from seven to twelve and added new sections for these domains.
• Minimum Contract Guarantee: Clarified conditions for the Minimum Guaranteed Award amount.
• Contract Types: Revised language to incorporate FAR 16.507-2(c)(3) (BPAs), FAR subpart 17.1 (Multiyear Contracting), and FAR subpart 17.2 (Options), while excluding agreements in FAR subpart 16.7.
• Eligibility & Competition: Clarified that contractors compete for task orders within awarded CLINs (NAICS Codes) based on their represented small business status at the time of offer submission. Added details on how team member changes can affect team size.
• Size Representation: Requires offerors to represent their size status for each NAICS Code within their proposed Domain(s) to ensure fair opportunity. Only CLINs where the entity is a small business concern will be awarded.
• C-SCRM Plan: Contractors must submit the C-SCRM Plan within Attachment J-3 within 90 days after the OASIS+ SB Notice to Proceed, and annually thereafter.
• Reporting: Clarified reporting requirements for executive compensation and first-tier subcontract awards in SAM.gov.
• Teaming Arrangements (CTAs): Contractors must notify the OASIS+ Contracting Officer (CO) of any changes to CTA documentation (e.g., joint venture agreements, subcontractor letters of commitment) within 30 calendar days. Size changes requiring re-representation must also be reported.
• Offeror Size Determination: Offeror size will be determined at the master contract level, including all team members and across all Domain submissions.
• Joint Ventures: Clarified rules for joint ventures, including mentor-protégé relationships and the submission of multiple offers.
• Pricing: Revised language regarding the Cost/Price Template, T&M/LH ceiling rates, and indirect cost rate submissions.
• Proposal Submission: Proposal submission capability will go live in the OASIS+ Submission Portal (OSP) on January 12, 2026.

Numerous sections of the RFP have been modified, including Sections B, C, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, and M, as well as various attachments (J.P-1, J.P-2, J.P-3, J.P-4, J.P-5, J.P-7, J.P-8, J.P-9, J.P-12, J.P-13, J.P-14).

Offerors must acknowledge this amendment. The proposal submission capability will go live on January 12, 2026. Changes affect eligibility, size representation, teaming arrangements, and various submission requirements.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This Excel workbook, "J.P-4 Domain Auto-Relevant NAICS Codes and PSCs (Amd 0008).xlsx", provides a comprehensive list of North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes and Product and Service Codes (PSCs) that are considered automatically relevant for evaluation credit under the "Relevance" qualification factor for the J.P-4 Domain opportunity. It is updated as of Amendment 0008.

• Instructions Sheet: Outlines how NAICS codes and PSCs are used for relevance qualification and provides important notes regarding verifying "Relevance" for task orders issued under Multiple Award Indefinite-Delivery/Indefinite-Quantity (MA-IDIQ) contracts. It details the required supporting documentation for task orders where the IDIQ's automatically applied NAICS code is not sufficient for validation.
• Domain-Specific Sheets (Technical & Engineering, Management & Advisory, Intelligence, Research & Development, Enterprise Solutions, Facilities, Environmental Services, Logistics, Financial Services, Social Services, Human Capital, Marketing and Public Relations): Each sheet lists specific "Auto-Relevant" NAICS Codes and their titles, as well as "Auto-Relevant" PSCs and their names, categorized by domain.
• Automatic Relevance Verification: Explains that Offerors can submit a Qualified Project (QP) for automatic relevance consideration if its assigned NAICS code or PSC matches an entry in this workbook. Required documentation includes an FPDS report or contract award document indicating the PSC or project-specific NAICS Code. Non-federal projects and federal subcontracts are ineligible for automatic relevance and require standard verification.

This document is crucial for bidders to understand which NAICS codes and PSCs will automatically qualify their past project experience for "Relevance" evaluation credit. Bidders should consult the relevant domain sheets to identify applicable codes for their submitted Qualified Projects (QPs) and ensure they have the necessary supporting documentation (e.g., FPDS reports) as outlined in the instructions.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document, Attachment J-2, outlines the requirements for reporting Task Order, Transactional Data, and Contract Access Fee (CAF) information. It details the specific data elements that contractors must report within the Government designated system for all orders issued under the Master Contract.

• Reporting Data Elements: Defines over 50 specific data points required for reporting, including Contract Number, OASIS+ IDIQ CLIN, Delivery/Task Order Number (PIID), Award Date, Description of Deliverable, Contract Type, Performance Based Contract indicator, GSA Assisted Services indicator, Issuing Agency & Bureau, Receiving Agency/Bureau, Non-Federal Entity, Ordering Contracting Officer Name, Period of Performance, Obligated/Funded Amounts, Total Estimated Value, and details on modifications.
• Invoice and Financial Data: Includes fields for invoice reporting period, paid date, amount, CLIN, line item type, quantity, unit of measure, price paid per unit, and total price.
• Contract Access Fee (CAF): Specifies fields for CAF voucher number, remit payment date, total CAF payment amount, and amount allocated per task order.
• Subcontracting Data: Requires reporting of subcontractor names, Unique Entity Identifiers (UEIs), total amount subcontracted for services, and similarly situated entity identification.
• Services Data: Details on type of work performed, place of performance, security clearance level, applicable labor law, employee location, labor category, and indirect costs.
• CLIN Structure: Provides a table mapping OASIS+ Program CLINs to Reporting Line Types, such as Labor Categories, Cost Reimbursement Services, Fixed Price Services, Materials and ODCs, Travel, Indirect Costs, and Contract Access Fee.

This attachment is crucial for understanding the reporting obligations and data requirements associated with any task orders issued under the Master Contract. Bidders should familiarize themselves with these reporting requirements to ensure compliance and accurate financial and performance tracking if awarded a contract. It details the information that will be tracked and reported by the government and expected from the contractor.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document contains questionnaires and instructions related to Cybersecurity and Supply Chain Risk Management (C-SCRM) for potential bidders. It is divided into pre-award and post-award sections, focusing on evaluating a contractor's maturity in safeguarding covered contractor information systems and their overall SCRM practices.

• Pre-Award Evaluation Instructions: Provides definitions for terms like 'Covered contractor information system' and 'Federal contract information.' It includes a questionnaire covering:
  • Contact Information
  • Access Control
  • Identification and Authentication
  • Media Protection
  • Physical Protection
  • System and Communications Protection
  • System and Information Integrity
• Post-Award Deliverable Instructions: Outlines requirements for a Cyber-Supply Chain Risk Management Plan, emphasizing the need for contractors to implement vigilant SCRM procedures to counter threats to Federal Government systems via supply chains.
• C-SCRM Plan Template: A detailed questionnaire covering:
  • Supply Chain Provenance (identity, ownership, U.S. location of suppliers, threat analysis for distributors)
  • Supply Chain Management and Supplier Governance (QMS, SCRM requirements in subcontracts, verification of supplier compliance)
  • Information Security (data categorization, incident detection/reporting, logging, endpoint protection, incident response team)
  • Physical Security (facility clearance, access control to cyber assets, adherence to standards, incident response)
  • Personnel Security (background checks, onboarding)
  • Supply Chain Integrity (managing defects, auditing suppliers, counterfeit prevention, reuse/recycle)
  • Supply Chain Resilience (business continuity, remote work, data backup, climate-related risk assessment, disaster response planning)

This document is critical for bidders to understand the cybersecurity and supply chain risk management requirements that will be assessed. It details the specific controls, policies, and documentation expected by the government regarding information systems, supplier management, and overall security posture. Bidders must review these requirements to ensure their organization can meet them and to prepare the necessary responses and supporting documentation.

Forms / Attachments / Pricing Sheets

This document, Attachment J-5, is a Task Order Clause and Provision Matrix for the OASIS+ contract. It serves as a reference for Ordering Contracting Officers (OCOs) and OASIS+ Contractors to identify applicable clauses and provisions at the Task Order level. It is current as of FAC: 2025-06, dated 10/01/2025, and includes a reference to the Revolutionary FAR Overhaul (RFO) by Deviation.

• Purpose and Use: To assist OCOs and contractors in determining applicable clauses and provisions for Task Orders.
• Incorporated Provisions: Lists FAR provisions incorporated by reference at the Task Order level, specifying applicability to contract types (FP, CR, TM, SB, UR) and including dates and any required fill-ins.
• Incorporated Clauses: Lists FAR clauses incorporated by reference, including Section E (Inspection and Acceptance), Section F (Deliveries or Performance), and Section I (Contract Clauses) covering DoD and DoL agency-specific requirements, and FAR 52.252-2 clauses.
• Deviations: Notes several deviations, particularly related to NOV 2025, indicating updates to FAR subpart 52.3 Provision and Clause Matrix are forthcoming.
• Tools: Recommends using the FAR Smart Matrix and Acquisition Regulation Comparator (ARC) tools for applicability.

This document is crucial for bidders as it outlines the specific FAR clauses and provisions that will likely be incorporated into individual Task Orders issued under the OASIS+ Master Contract. Understanding these clauses is essential for accurately preparing proposals, understanding contractual obligations, and ensuring compliance. The matrix provides a comprehensive overview of potential contractual terms, including those related to inspection, acceptance, delivery, performance, agency-specific requirements, and various other aspects of contract performance. Bidders should pay close attention to the dates and any noted deviations, as these indicate current or upcoming regulatory changes that may affect contract terms.

Amendment / Modification

This document, Amendment 0008, provides the OASIS+ Domain Qualifications Matrices and Scorecards. It details the qualification thresholds and scoring criteria for various OASIS+ Domains, applicable to both Small Business/Socioeconomic (SB/SE) and Unrestricted (UR) contract types.

Key information includes:

• Qualification Thresholds: Specifies the minimum credits required for award in each Domain (e.g., 36/50 for SB/SE, 42/50 for UR, with an exception for Enterprise Solutions UR at 45/50).
• Domain Abbreviations: Defines abbreviations for various service domains (M&A, T&E, R&D, INTEL, ENT, ENV, FAC, LOG, FS, HC, BA, M&PR, SS).
• Scoring Criteria: Outlines how offers will be evaluated based on Qualifying Projects (QPs) and Federal Experience Projects (FEPs), including relevance, scale, integrated experience, management & staffing, past performance, and specific certifications.
• Mentor-Protégé Joint Venture (MP-JV) Specifics: Details reduced thresholds for Qualifying Projects and Federal Experience Projects submitted under the protégé's name.

This document serves as a detailed guide for offerors to understand the qualification requirements for each OASIS+ Domain, referencing specific sections of the RFP (Sections L and M) for further details on instructions and evaluation factors.

Offerors must use these matrices and scorecards to prepare their proposals, ensuring they meet or exceed the specified qualification thresholds for each Domain they intend to bid on. The document emphasizes the importance of reviewing Sections L and M of the RFP for comprehensive instructions and evaluation criteria.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document, "ATTACHMENT J.P-2 Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) SAMPLE," provides a sample of an FPDS report and instructions for bidders on how to use it to verify project experience as required by the OASIS+ RFP. It details the steps to access and interpret FPDS data, and includes a crosswalk table mapping elements within the OSP (Offeror's Submission Package) to corresponding data fields in FPDS.

• FPDS Access: Instructions to visit www.fpds.gov and use the ezSearch function.
• Information Required: Guidance on searching by contract number, task order number, contractor name, or UEI/DUNS number.
• Data Verification: Explanation of how FPDS reports verify project experience against RFP Sections L.5.2 and L.5.3.
• Crosswalk Table: Maps OSP elements (e.g., Prime Contractor, Contract Number, Period of Performance, Total Contract Value, NAICS Code) to specific FPDS data fields.
• Alternative Verification: Outlines that if FPDS reports are unavailable or insufficient, verification may be provided through documents identified in section L.5.1.3.1.
• Sample FPDS Report: Includes a sample FPDS report (pages 3-7) illustrating correct data fields for verification.

This attachment is crucial for bidders to understand how to properly document and verify their past project experience as required by the solicitation. It guides them on extracting relevant information from FPDS and presenting it in their proposal to meet the "Qualifying Project Experience - Relevance" criteria. Failure to provide adequate verification may impact scoring.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document, "J.P-3 PROJECT VERIFICATION FORM (Current as of AMD 0008)", is an attachment used to verify project experience for potential bidders. It serves to document customer, joint venture (JV), or Multiple Award Schedule Contractor Teaming Arrangement (MAS CTA) project experience in accordance with specific solicitation sections (L.5.2 and L.5.3).

• Part I: Offeror Information: Collects details about the bidding entity, including JV or MRCL information if applicable.
• Part II: Project Identification: Gathers information about the specific project being used for experience verification, including contractor name, contract number, project name, funding agency/customer, period of performance, total contract value, and NAICS/PSC code.
• Domain Relevance: Sections for detailing the relevance of the project to proposed domains, including narrative explanations and QP minimum average annual dollar value and average annual value of relevant work.
• Part III: Project Qualifications: A checklist for offerors to indicate which specific qualifications (Integrated, Management & Staffing, Scale, Specialized Functional Experience, etc.) their claimed project meets, referencing RFP sections.
• Part IV: Customer Certification: Section for the customer (Contracting Officer or Corporate Official) to certify the contractor's performance.
• Part V: Joint Venture Certification: For JV members to certify performance.
• Part VI: MAS CTA Member Certification: For MAS CTA members to certify performance.

Bidders must use this form to document and verify their relevant project experience as required by the solicitation. It is crucial for demonstrating that the offeror meets the qualification criteria outlined in the RFP, particularly for specific domains and capabilities. The form requires detailed information about past projects and must be certified by the customer or relevant entity to be considered valid.

Amendment / Modification

This document is Amendment 0008 to Attachment J.P-5, which details Functional Areas and Sub-Areas for claiming "Integrated Experience" credit in accordance with solicitation Section L.5.2.3.3. The amendment clarifies that with the exception of "Enterprise Solutions," each Domain included in the solicitation is considered a distinct functional area. Additional functional areas are detailed in Section 2 of this document.

• Attachment J.P-5: Functional Areas and Sub-Areas (Amendment 0008)
• Section 1: Functional Areas and Sub-areas Included in this Solicitation (Domains)
• Section 2: Additional Functional Areas and Sub-areas for Claiming Integrated Experience

This amendment does not appear to directly impact proposal submission deadlines or evaluation factors, but clarifies the scope of functional areas relevant to the solicitation.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document is the "Past Performance Rating Form" (Attachment J.P-6), used to evaluate an offeror's past performance on previous contracts. It is intended to be filled out by a "Rater" (e.g., Contracting Officer, COR, or customer official) to provide an assessment of the contractor's performance.

The form requires information about the past performance project, including:

• Contractor Name, Contract Number, Project Title, Project Value, and Period of Performance.
• Rater's Name, Title, Agency/Customer, Phone, E-mail, and Signature.

It then requires the Rater to provide an "Adjectival Rating" (Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, Unsatisfactory, or Not Applicable) for five criteria:

1. Technical (Quality of Service)
2. Cost Control
3. Schedule/Timeliness
4. Management or Business Relations
5. Small Business Subcontracting (only applicable to Federal Prime Contract Awards)
6. Other (as applicable), including areas like trafficking violations, tax delinquency, terminations, etc.

Definitions for each adjectival rating are provided for each criterion. Space is also provided for "Additional Comments" for each section.

This form is crucial for bidders as it outlines the specific criteria and rating scales that will be used to evaluate their past performance. Understanding these criteria will help bidders prepare their past performance narratives and ensure they highlight relevant experience that aligns with the government's evaluation standards. The ratings provided by the government on this form will directly impact the past performance evaluation of an offeror's proposal.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document, "ATTACHMENT J.P-7 CTA Qualifications & MRCL List Template," provides a template for offerors to document their Contractor Teaming Arrangement (CTA) qualifications and Meaningful Relationship Commitments (MRCL). It is intended for use by Joint Venture Offerors and other entities submitting proposals under OASIS+ contract families.

• Section A: Collects information on the "Offering JV Entity" and "JV Member" entities, including their legal name, work performed, and qualifications (unique capabilities, business systems, certifications, clearances).
• Section B: Documents CTA subcontractor team members. It requires the "Offering Entity Legal Name," "SAM UEID," "Solicitation No.," "Contract Name," and "Signature of Authorized Rep." It also includes a table to list "Proposed Subcontractor Legal Name," "SAM UEID," and "Business Size at Time of Proposal Submission."
• Section C: Documents "Meaningful Relationship Commitments" (MRCL). It requires similar information as Section B for the offering entity and includes a table to list "MRCL Entity Legal Name," "SAM UEID," "Project(s)," and "Certifications/Systems/Resources Claimed."

This template is crucial for bidders to properly document their team structure, capabilities, and commitments as required by the solicitation. It directly impacts proposal preparation and evaluation by providing the government with transparency into the proposed teaming arrangements and the qualifications of all participating entities.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document, "J.P-8 Direct Labor Hourly Rate Ranges (Amd 0008).xlsx", provides direct labor hourly rate ranges in support of the OASIS+ solicitation. It is intended to inform bidders about the expected salary ranges for various labor categories.

• The attachment lists specific OASIS+ labor categories, their corresponding SOC numbers, and defined LOW and HIGH hourly rate ranges.
• Examples include "Engineers, All Other (SME)", "Managers, All Other (SME)", and "Accountants and Auditors (SME)", each with associated rate ranges.

This information is crucial for bidders to understand the government's expectations for direct labor costs. It can be used to inform pricing strategies and ensure that proposed labor rates are within the anticipated ranges, as referenced in RFP Section L.5.7.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document, "J.P-9 Cost-Price Template (Amd 0008).xlsx", is an Excel spreadsheet attachment providing a template for offerors to submit their cost and pricing information. It is an update associated with Amendment 0008 to the solicitation.

• Instructions Sheet: Provides guidance on completing the cost/price template, including:
  • Entering the Offeror's Official Legal Entity Name and SAM UEID.
  • Defining and entering indirect cost pool names (Fringe Benefits, Overhead, G&A, and up to 10 additional optional pools) and their corresponding rate percentages.
  • Entering profit percentage.
  • Entering direct labor rates for 20 labor categories.
  • Explains pre-populated formulas for calculating loaded hourly labor rates, including Fringe Benefits, Overhead, G&A, and Profit, and notes that these formulas can be edited to reflect the offeror's specific indirect rate structure and allocation bases.
  • Details an embedded 4.41% escalation factor for Years 1-15 of sole source T&M/LH ceiling rates.
  • Warns against adding/deleting rows/columns or changing file formats to maintain compatibility with the OASIS+ Submission Portal (OSP).
• Cost-Price Template Sheet: Contains the actual template with columns for:
  • Labor SOC Number
  • OASIS+ Labor Category
  • Direct Labor Rate
  • Indirect Cost Pools (Fringe Benefits, Overhead, G&A, up to 10 additional)
  • Profit
  • Loaded Hourly Labor Rates for Years 1 through 15.

Offerors must use this template to structure and submit their detailed cost and pricing proposals. It is crucial to follow the instructions carefully, particularly regarding the accurate input of direct labor rates, indirect cost pools, profit, and the understanding of the pre-populated formulas and escalation factors. Any deviations or modifications to the template's structure may affect submission portal compatibility. The "Basis of Estimate" section of the RFP (Section L.5.7.3) should be consulted for further details on indirect rates and allocation bases.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document is an optional Subcontractor Letter of Commitment Template, current as of Amendment 0008. It is intended for use by a proposed subcontractor to formally commit to providing services to a prime contractor under the OASIS+ Multi-Agency Contract (MAC) if the prime contractor is awarded a task order.

• Statement of Commitment: Outlines the agreement for the subcontractor to provide services within specific domains (e.g., Intelligence, Engineering, Logistics) as determined at the Task Order level.
• Authorization to Use Past Performance: Grants the prime contractor permission to include the subcontractor's project experience and past performance in their OASIS+ proposal.
• Limitations on Subcontracting: Acknowledges the FAR 52.219-14 requirements regarding subcontracting percentages for small businesses, particularly concerning similarly situated entities and the distinction between services and supplies.
• Legal Information: Sections for the Prime Contractor's and Proposed Subcontractor's legal names and Unique Entity IDs (UEIDs) from SAM.gov.
• Subcontractor's Representative for Validation: Contact details for the subcontractor's representative.
• Authorized Signature: A section for the subcontractor's authorized representative to sign, confirming their commitment.

Potential prime contractors should use this template to secure commitments from their proposed subcontractors. Subcontractors can use this form to formally express their intent to provide services and allow their past performance to be cited. It ensures clarity on the scope of work, past performance authorization, and adherence to subcontracting limitations.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document, "J.P-13 Financial Data Input Template (Amd 0008).xlsx", is an Excel spreadsheet attachment intended to support the OASIS+ solicitation. It serves as a template for offerors to input their financial data.

• Offeror Information: Fields for Offeror Name, Offeror SAM UEID, JV Team Member Name (if applicable), and Entity SAM UEID.
• Financial Categories: Sections for Current Assets, PPE, Other Assets, Total Assets, Current Liabilities, Other Liabilities, Total Liabilities, Net Sales, and Net Income.
• Data Input: Offerors are required to input financial information by year for each applicable category, covering the previous three years, based on their financial statements.
• Instructions: Explicit guidance is provided for data input and for unpopulated joint ventures, requiring separate templates for each JV member, mentor, and/or protégé.

This template is crucial for bidders as it dictates the format and specific financial data required for submission as part of their proposal. The data entered will be verified against submitted financial statements during the evaluation process, as per Solicitation Section L.5.8.3. Failure to accurately complete this template may impact the evaluation of the offeror's financial standing and overall proposal.