SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE ENGINEERING TOOLS 2 (SET 2) BRIDGE CONTRACT
Overview
Buyer
Place of Performance
NAICS
PSC
Set Aside
Original Source
Timeline
Qualification Details
Fit reasons
- NAICS alignment with historical contract wins in similar service areas.
- Scope strongly matches core technical capabilities and delivery model.
Risks
- Past performance thresholds may require one additional teaming partner.
- Potential clarification needed on staffing minimums before bid/no-bid.
Next steps
Validate eligibility requirements, assign capture owner, and schedule partner outreach to confirm teaming strategy before submission planning.
Quick Summary
The National Aeronautics And Space Administration (NASA) Goddard Space Flight Center has issued a Limited-Sources Justification (LSJ) for the Systems and Software Engineering Tools 2 (SET 2) Bridge Contract. This action provides specialized system and software engineering support for mission-critical activities at the Katherine Johnson Independent Verification and Validation (IV&V) Facility in Fairmont, WV. The estimated value is $7,625,157.37 for a 12-month period of performance.
Scope of Work
The contract requires highly specialized system and software engineering support, including:
- IV&V Program Mission-Critical Support
- Jon McBride Software Testing and Research Laboratory Development & Maintenance
- JPL Multi-Mission Ground System (MGSS) Technical Support
- JPL Software Development & Maintenance Support
- IV&V Specialized Tools Enhancements & Support
Contract & Timeline
- Type: Limited-Sources Justification (LSJ) for a Bridge Contract
- Contract Vehicle: Multiple Awards Schedule (MAS) Program, GSA FSS 54151S
- Awardee: TMC Technologies of West Virginia Corporation (Contract 47QTCA24D0055)
- Estimated Value: $7,625,157.37
- Period of Performance: 12 months, beginning June 1, 2026
- Published Date: June 4, 2026
Justification & Rationale
This acquisition is justified under FAR 8.401(b)/GSAM 538.7104-3(b)(ii) due to the unique and highly specialized nature of the services required. The incumbent contractor, TMC Technologies, possesses the necessary expertise and knowledge to ensure continuity of services and avoid disruption to mission-critical systems and activities. The urgency, driven by the short timeframe before the current SET 2 BPA expires, makes a transition to a new contractor impractical and risky.
Additional Notes
This LSJ explains the non-competitive nature of this specific bridge contract. While this particular award is not open for competitive bidding, the rationale provided may offer insights for potential bidders regarding future competitive procurements for similar services.