Alliant 3 GWAC, Request for Proposal (RFP)

Questions & Answers / Clarifications

This document contains responses to vendor questions and feedback regarding the Alliant 3 Government Responses to Request For Proposal (RFP) Feedback GR Set 03.

• Eligibility for Vendors without Prior Federal IT Experience: Vendors without prior experience in federal IT projects are eligible to submit proposals.
• Combining Task Orders: Offerors may combine a subset of task orders under an IDIQ and cite other task orders under the master IDIQ as separate projects for relevant experience.
• Joint Ventures (JVs): A JV Offeror with an existing Contractor Teaming Arrangement (CTA) claiming experience gained as a prime contractor needs to submit a CTA Template (J.P-1). If claiming experience as a subcontractor, a Subcontractor Experience Project Template (J.P-4) is required. New JV arrangements are eligible to bid.
• NAICS Codes: Only the five NAICS codes listed in the RFP are applicable. Offerors can apply for authorized NAICS code credit via Attachment J.P-2 if a project supports an authorized NAICS code but has a different primary NAICS code in FPDS-NG.
• Relevant Experience Verification: Projects require a signature from the appropriate party for verification; unsigned projects will not earn points.
• Multiple Projects from Same Client: Offerors can use multiple projects from the same client to meet relevant experience requirements.
• Form Consolidation: Feedback was received recommending the consolidation of forms (J.P-1, J.P-2, J.P-3, J.P-4), but the government believes the RFP is well-defined.
• Small Business Engagement (J.P-5): The Small Business Contractor Attestation must be signed by the Small Business Prime Contractor. The "Cognizant Project Official" and "Prime Contractor Representative" in J.P-5 refer to the same small business individual who performed the work.
• Past Performance: Separate and distinct past performance reports can be submitted for different projects. An offeror cannot submit two past performance reports for the same project.
• Self-Scoring Worksheet (J.P-16): Points are awarded for cost-based contracts, and the government believes the RFP is well-defined in this area.
• Subcontractor Experience: Other Than Small Business (OTSB) Offerors cannot use the relevant experience of first-tier subcontractors. Small Business Offerors with First-Tier Subcontractors may use relevant experience from L.5.1.4.2-Alt.
• Proposal Submission: Offerors are to upload SF33 and SF30 documents into Symphony. File naming conventions are flexible, but bidders should follow recommended names in Table 22.
• Mergers, Acquisitions, Novations: Offerors must provide evidence of the merger, acquisition, novation, or change-of-name agreement and justification demonstrating how the claimed evaluation element is applicable.
• Contract Acceptance Period: The government acknowledges feedback regarding the 365-day acceptance period and will consider adjustments.
• Maximum Contract Ceiling: There is no maximum dollar ceiling for the Alliant 3 Master Contract or individual Task Orders.
• Cybersecurity Requirements: Compliance with NIST SP 800-171 is considered sufficient for C-SCRM requirements.
• Security Clearances (DD Form 254): The DD Form 254 will be provided at the Task Order level, not the IDIQ level.
• On-Ramp Process: The government appreciates feedback on a more frequent and consistent on-ramp process.
• Meaningful Relationship Commitment Letters (MRCLs): Mere ownership is insufficient; offerors must demonstrate the functionality of the MRCL and how entities interact and share resources. A single MRCL for a parent company controlling all entities is acceptable.
• Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI): The RFP requires an OCI plan. The government believes the RFP is well-defined in this area.
• Relevant Experience for Subcontractors: Subcontractors can use their performed work for relevant experience, regardless of whether it's used by another prime offeror. The value and scope of the subcontracted work may be claimed.
• Emerging Technology (ET) Projects: Multiple projects from the same client can be used for ET relevant experience. SOW/PWS may not always be available for emerging technologies; J.P-3 signed by the Cognizant Project Official is intended to demonstrate performance.
• Past Performance for Collections of Task Orders: For collections of task orders, CPARS must be for the overarching IDIQ, but other evidence (e.g., FPDS reports) is required for each task order.
• Small Business Emerging Technology Solutions Engagement: This can include small businesses that provided the ET as a subcontractor. Projects supporting a prime Federal contract count as Federal projects.
• Total Price Evaluation: If offerors propose ceiling rates from Attachment J.P-8, the government will consider the Total Price fair and reasonable.

These responses clarify various aspects of the RFP, including eligibility, submission requirements, and evaluation criteria, providing bidders with a clearer understanding of how to prepare their proposals.

Questions & Answers / Clarifications

This document contains government responses to vendor questions regarding the Alliant 3 Request for Proposal (RFP) Feedback GR Set 02.

• Small Business Engagement Template (J.P-5): Clarification sought on whether SOW, PWS, and/or SOO documents are required for both non-federal and federal projects for small business engagement credit.
• Past Performance Rating Template (J.P-6): Request to update the form to allow completion by Contracting Officer's Representatives or Contracting Officer's Technical Representatives, not just Contracting Officers.
• Price Template (J.P-8): Questions regarding omitted labor categories, clarification on Labor ID 153 vs. 123, and a requested change from Senior Computer Network Support Specialist to Senior Computer and Information Systems Manager.
• Subcontracting Plan Template (J.P-9): Issues with locked cells in the template and a request for clarification on the description of methods for identifying potential sources.
• Contractor C-SCRM Responsibility Questionnaire (J.P-11): Inquiry about submitting the Excel form in PDF format due to signature requirements.
• Self-Scoring Worksheet (J.P-16): Request for reconsideration of scoring for Cognizant Federal Agency (CFA) for Accounting System and Audit Information, Approved Purchasing System, and Acceptable Estimating System.
• Labor Rate Attestation (J.P-18): Clarification on when the attestation form is required and guidance on naming conventions for supporting evidence.
• Maximum Contract Ceiling and Minimum Contract Guarantee: Confirmation sought on the justification for an unlimited ceiling for the master contract and task orders, referencing class deviations.
• Labor Category Types: Questions regarding the applicability of ceiling rates for different skill levels and confirmation of understanding for SME skill level rates.
• Special Contract Requirement Provisions: Request for confirmation of which provisions in Table 8 are applicable at the Master Contract level.
• Individual Labor Categories: Numerous questions and clarifications regarding discrepancies and naming conventions for labor categories between different attachments (J-3 and J.P-8).
• Mergers, Acquisitions, Novations, and Change-of-Name Agreements: Clarification on acceptable documentation for change of name agreements and confirmation of referencing the correct section for primary NAICS code relevant experience.
• Proposal Format: Clarifications on file naming conventions, submission of SOW/PWS for emerging technology projects, naming structures for CPARS/J.P-6, and file extension types (.xlsx vs. .xls).
• Meaningful Relationship Commitment Letters: Multiple questions regarding the interpretation and application of requirements for demonstrating meaningful relationships, particularly concerning affiliates, subsidiaries, and wholly-owned entities.
• Systems, Certifications, and Clearances: Requests for clarification on the timing of certification requirements (e.g., solicitation release date vs. contract award date) for various certifications like CMMI, ISO/IEC 20000-1:2018, and ISO 27001.
• Past Performance: Clarifications on the applicability of requirements for federal vs. non-federal projects, the use of Other Transaction Agreements (OTA) task orders, and the submission of CPARS/J.P-6 for collections of task orders.

These responses indicate that several attachments and sections of the RFP have been or will be updated via Amendment 2, addressing many of the vendors' concerns and clarifying ambiguities. Vendors should review Amendment 2 for specific changes.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document, "J.P-8 A3 Price Template V.2.xlsx", is a pricing template required for bidders responding to Solicitation #47QTCB24R0009. It is used to propose maximum ceiling labor rates for Time-and-Material (T&M) and Labor-Hour (L-H) Task Orders over a 15-year contract period.

• Four Tabs: Offerors must complete 1_GovernmentWorksite, 2_ContractorWorksite, 3a_GovtRateEvidence, and 3b_ContractorRateEvidence. The 4_TotalPrice tab calculates automatically.
• Labor Rates: Bidders must input proposed fully-burdened hourly labor rates for various labor categories for Contract Year 1. Rates for subsequent years are calculated using a BLS escalation factor (3.93%).
• Rate Evidence: If proposed rates exceed the provided reference maximums (based on Alliant 2 CY9 rates), bidders must provide evidence of prior contract awards with those higher rates in Tabs 3a and 3b, including contract and task order numbers.
• Total Price: Calculated automatically based on proposed rates and a standard 2000 hours per labor category.

This template is critical for bidders to accurately propose their labor costs. The proposed ceiling rates will be incorporated into the awarded Master Contract and will bind T&M/L-H Task Orders. Failure to provide required evidence for rates exceeding reference maximums may impact proposal evaluation. Bidders must carefully follow the data entry instructions for each tab to ensure compliance with RFP Section L.5.8.2 and L.4.1.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document is a template for an Individual Subcontracting Plan (ISP) required for the Alliant 3 Governmentwide Acquisition Contract (GWAC). It provides a framework for offerors to detail their plans for subcontracting with small businesses, aligning with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) requirements.

• Instructions: Provides guidance on reviewing FAR requirements (Subpart 19.7), understanding statutory obligations for small business participation, and clarifies that this template is a tool, not a fill-in-the-blank document that replaces FAR requirements.
• Identification Data: Collects essential information such as Solicitation Number (47QTCB24R0009), NAICS code (541512), place of performance (Worldwide), and details for the Subcontracting Program Administrator.
• Subcontracting Goals: Includes sections for offerors to input planned subcontracting dollars and percentages for both the base and option periods, broken down by 'All Small Businesses' and 'Other than Small Business (OTSB)'. It also details goals for specific small business socioeconomic categories (VOSB, SDVOSB, HUBZone, SDB, WOSB) as a percentage of total subcontracting dollars.
• FAR Elements: Requires descriptions of the methods used to develop subcontracting goals, ensure good faith efforts, identify potential sources, and provide equitable opportunities. It also mandates the identification of principal types of supplies and services to be subcontracted, including NAICS codes and business sizes.
• Statements, Assurances, and Signatures: Outlines required acknowledgments and certifications regarding payment basis, material contract parts, indirect costs, good faith efforts, and assurances of "flow down" of FAR clauses, cooperation with reporting, and timely payments to subcontractors. It includes signature blocks for company officials and the Contracting Officer.

This template is crucial for any offeror intending to bid on the Alliant 3 GWAC. It outlines the specific requirements and expectations for developing and submitting an Individual Subcontracting Plan. Bidders must understand these requirements to ensure their proposals are compliant and to demonstrate their commitment to small business utilization. The document details how to calculate and report subcontracting goals across various small business categories.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document is the "A3 Contractor C-SCRM Responsibility Questionnaire" (Attachment J.P-11) for the Alliant 3 Unrestricted GWAC. It is designed to assess an offeror's adherence to basic safeguarding of covered contractor information systems, as required by FAR 52.204-21.

The questionnaire is divided into nine sections, each addressing specific NIST SP 800-53 controls or FAR clauses:

• Section 1: Access Control (NIST SP 800-53 Controls: AC-2, AC-3, AC-17, AC-20, AC-22)
• Section 2: Identification and Authentication (NIST SP 800-53 Controls: IA-2, IA-3, IA-5)
• Section 3: Media Protection (NIST SP 800-53 Controls: MP-2, MP-4, MP-6)
• Section 4: Physical Protection (NIST SP 800-53 Controls: PE-2, PE-3, PE-4, PE-5, PE-6)
• Section 5: System and Communications Protection (NIST SP 800-53 Controls: SC-7)
• Section 6: System and Information Integrity (NIST SP 800-53 Controls: SI-2, SI-3, SI-5)
• Section 7: Prohibition on Contracting for Hardware, Software, and Services Developed or Provided by Kaspersky Lab and Other Covered Entities (FAR 52.204-23)
• Section 889 Compliance (FAR 52.204-25, FAR 52.204-26, FAR 52.204-24)
• Section 9: Federal Acquisition Supply Chain Security Act Orders (FAR 52.204-29, FAR 52.204-30, Alt 1)

Offerors must answer "Yes" or "No" to each question. The form also requires offeror information, including company name and primary Point-Of-Contact details.

Completion of this questionnaire is mandatory. A "no" response to any item disqualifies the organization from receiving an Alliant 3 GWAC Master Contract award. The responses will be used by GSA for a separate risk assessment, and approval is required for award eligibility. Bidders must ensure they can truthfully answer "Yes" to all questions to be considered.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document, "Attachment J.P-18 Labor Rate Attestation," is a required form for offerors responding to the Alliant 3 Request for Proposal (RFP). It is used to attest to proposed labor hour rates, particularly when they exceed the Government-referenced Alliant 2 published labor hour rates. If proposed rates exceed the referenced rates, supporting evidence from a Time-and-Material / Labor-Hour Federally awarded Government contract at the higher rate must be provided.

• Rate Attestation: Offerors must select one of two options: either their proposed rates do not exceed the Government-referenced rates (no evidence needed), or they do exceed them and evidence is included.
• Attestation Statement: A statement confirming the accuracy of the submitted labor hour ceiling rates and that they reflect historical rates in the Contractor's accounting records.
• Table 1: Contract Number Evidence List: A table to list contract and task order numbers for each proposed Labor ID (LCAT) that exceeds the Alliant 2 published rates. It also requires indicating the applicable worksite location (Government and/or Contractor).
• Evidence Submission: Offerors must insert rate tables from supporting contracts/task orders into the PDF, separated by title pages that identify the Contract/Task Order Number, Labor ID(s), and Work-Site.
• Signature: Requires signature of an Approving Official, including their printed name, title, or position.

This form is critical for bidders whose proposed labor rates are higher than those published by the government for the Alliant 2 contract. Failure to properly complete and submit this attestation with the required supporting evidence could impact the evaluation of the offeror's proposed rates and potentially their overall proposal competitiveness.

Amendment / Modification

This amendment (0002) to Solicitation 47QTCB24R0009, originally dated 06/28/2024, extends the offers' receipt date. The document details numerous changes across various sections of the RFP, primarily affecting attachments, paragraph references, and specific requirements for proposal submission and evaluation.

Key changes include:

• Attachment Updates: Several RFP attachments have been updated or replaced, including pricing templates, subcontracting plan templates, and responsibility questionnaires. New versions are provided in PDF format, some with fillable and signable features.
• Paragraph and Section Revisions: Numerous sections have been modified, including clarifications on indirect costs, labor rate attestations, accounting system requirements, purchasing systems, estimating systems, and past performance criteria.
• Submission Requirements: Changes affect how certain documentation should be submitted, including file naming conventions, the format of audit reports, and the inclusion of specific forms like GSA Form 527 and Labor Rate Attestation Forms.
• Evaluation Criteria: Adjustments have been made to how certain criteria are evaluated, such as the scoring for Emerging Technology Relevant Experience and the handling of joint ventures and subcontractors.
• Deadlines: The proposal due date has been extended to January 10, 2025, 4:00 p.m. Eastern Time.

This amendment impacts numerous sections of the RFP, including but not limited to:

• Attachments J.P-8, J.P-9, J.P-11, J.P-16, J.P-18, and J.P-3.
• Sections B.4(c), B.11.5.1(a), H.1, L.3, L.3.2, L.3.4, L.4, L.4.1 (Tables 22 and 23), L.5.1.2, L.5.1.3, L.5.1.4(g), L.5.1.5(f)(5), L.5.2.1(d), L.5.2.3.1, L.5.2.3.2, L.5.2.3.4, L.5.2.3.5, L.5.2.3.6, L.5.2.4, L.5.2.4.2(c), L.5.2.4.2(d), L.5.2.4.3, L.5.2.4.4, L.5.3.2, L.5.4.1, L.5.4.2, L.5.4.3, L.5.4.5, L.5.4.6, L.5.4.7, L.5.4.8, L.5.4.9, L.5.5.1, L.5.7.1, L.5.8, M.4.2, and M.6.

Offerors must acknowledge receipt of this amendment. The proposal submission deadline has been extended to January 10, 2025. Bidders must review all changes carefully to ensure their proposals comply with the updated requirements, including revised attachment formats, submission instructions, and evaluation criteria.

Solicitation / RFP / RFQ

This document is an Official Request for Proposal (RFP) for the Alliant 3 Governmentwide Acquisition Contract (GWAC). It is a Multiple Award, Indefinite-Delivery, Indefinite-Quantity (IDIQ) contract designed to provide information technology (IT) services-based solutions. The contract vehicle allows for the performance of a broad range of IT services, including the integration of various technologies critical to the services being acquired. Task Orders will be issued by federal agencies off the GSA Alliant 3 GWAC.

The scope of work encompasses a wide array of IT services, including but not limited to:

• Infrastructure support

• Application Services

• IT Management Services

• Cloud Computing

• Big Data & Big Data Analytics

• Energy, Sustainability, and Environmental Management IT Services

• Ancillary Services, Supplies and Construction

• Contract Security Requirements

• Performance Work Statement (PWS)

• Innovative Solutions

• Contract Type: Multiple Award IDIQ

• Period of Performance: Base period plus a single five-year Option period, potentially extending the cumulative term to a maximum of 10 years.

• Maximum Contract Ceiling: Unlimited. No maximum dollar ceiling for the Master Contract or individual Task Orders.

• Minimum Contract Guarantee: $2,500 per Alliant 3 Base Contract for the full term.

• Proposals must be submitted electronically via Symphony.

• Evaluation will be based on a "Highest Technically Rated Offerors with a Fair and Reasonable Price" (HTR/F&RP) approach.

• Key evaluation factors include Past Performance, Relevant Experience, Systems, Certifications, and Clearances, and Price.

• Specific submission instructions, page limits, and formatting requirements are detailed in Section L.

• Key deadlines include proposal submission by 4:00 PM ET on 07/26/2024.

• The contract is for an unrestricted GWAC.

• Small business subcontracting goals are outlined in Section G.22.1 and Attachment J-5.B.

• The official SF-33 form is separately attached and must be completed as described in L.5.1.1.

• Performance-based contracting techniques will be applied to Task Orders to the "maximum extent practicable."

• Labor Categories (LCATs) are defined in Attachment J-3.

• Cybersecurity and Supply Chain Risk Management (C-SCRM) requirements are detailed in Section H.6 and Attachment J-4.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document is a self-scoring worksheet (Attachment J.P-16) for the Alliant 3 Unrestricted GWAC solicitation (Solicitation Number: 47QTCB24R0009). It is designed to help offerors verify their proposal against the requirements outlined in Section L of the solicitation and to self-score their proposal based on various criteria.

• Offeror Information: A field to fill in the Offeror Name.
• Section L Compliance: Sections L.5.1.1 through L.5.1.10 cover general requirements such as SF33 completion, subcontracting plans, teaming arrangements, compensation plans, and organizational conflict of interest.
• Relevant Experience Scoring: Detailed sections for scoring based on Primary NAICS Code Relevant Experience (L.5.2.2), Project Size & Complexity (L.5.2.3.3), Multiple Agency Awards (L.5.2.3.4), Cost-Reimbursement Experience (L.5.2.3.5), and Foreign Location Experience (L.5.2.3.6).
• Emerging Technology Experience: Scoring for relevant experience in various emerging technologies (L.5.2.4.2), breadth of experience (L.5.2.4.3), and engagement with small businesses (L.5.2.4.4).
• Past Performance: A section to document past performance ratings for relevant projects (L.5.3).
• Systems, Certifications, and Clearances: Scoring for systems (Accounting, Purchasing, FPRA, EVMS, Estimating), industry certifications (CMMI, ISO), and government facility clearances (L.5.4).
• Responsibility & Sustainability: Sections for responsibility (GSA Form 527, C-SCRM) and sustainability disclosures (GHG) (L.5.5, L.5.7).
• Organizational Risk Assessment: Evaluation of prior performance in proposed business arrangements (L.5.6).
• Scoring Fields: Columns for "Enter Yes OR No for each question as applicable," "Point Value," and "Score," along with fields for "File Name(s)" and "NAICS Project Identifier" where applicable.

Bidders must use this worksheet to ensure their proposal addresses all requirements and to understand how their proposal will be evaluated. It serves as a guide for assembling compliant and competitive proposals, particularly concerning relevant experience, technical capabilities, and certifications. The worksheet prompts offerors to self-assess their compliance and score against specific criteria detailed in Section L of the solicitation.

Questions & Answers / Clarifications

This document contains government responses to vendor questions regarding the Alliant 3 Government Responses to Request For Proposal (RFP) Feedback, GR Set 01, dated 08.23.24.

• Symphony Tagging: The government clarified that Symphony tagging functions like a "Find" feature in documents, allowing users to select text or add notes/comments to PDFs to substantiate claims. This process helps evaluators validate claims more easily and expedite the evaluation.
• NAICS Code for Relevant Experience: If submitting supporting documentation under a different NAICS code, offerors should select the closest of the five provided NAICS codes and request Contracting Officer confirmation.
• Individual Subcontracting Plan (J.P-9): Offerors may choose the initial format for their plan, but the final submission (Attachment J-7) must be a reformatted PDF, digitally signed. References to J-7 in Section G.22 pertain to this final submission.
• GSA Form 527: Offerors are required to submit GSA Form 527 (rev 10/2015 or the revised V2 version compatible with Symphony) and cannot substitute it with audited financial statements or DCMA Financial Capability Reviews.
• Time-and-Material (T&M) / Labor-Hour (L-H) Rates: Maximum ceiling rates for T&M/L-H Task Orders/CLINs apply only to the Senior Skill Level for CONUS locations up to the Secret security classification. Other skill levels and higher classifications will be negotiated at the task order level.
• Symphony File Size Limit: The maximum file size for uploaded documents in Symphony is 100 MB.
• Mentor-Protege JV: For a Mentor-Protege JV to receive Organizational Risk Assessment (ORA) points, the JV and its Small Business CTA (SBCTA) First-Tier Subcontractors must have performed exclusively and together on each relevant experience project.

These clarifications provide specific guidance on proposal preparation, document submission, and evaluation criteria, particularly concerning Symphony usage, subcontracting plans, and relevant experience documentation. Offerors should review these responses carefully to ensure compliance with RFP requirements.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document, "J.P-12 A3 C-SCRM References V.2.pdf", provides a comprehensive list of references related to Cybersecurity and Supply Chain Risk Management (SCRM). It is intended to inform contractors about the legal, regulatory, and policy landscape governing SCRM and cybersecurity requirements applicable to government contracts.

The document is organized into the following sections:

• A. Laws: Lists relevant federal statutes such as the Clinger-Cohen Act, FISMA, FITARA, and the Privacy Act.
• B. Executive Orders (EO): Cites executive orders related to cybersecurity, critical infrastructure, and supply chain resilience.
• C. Presidential Directives: Includes directives concerning critical infrastructure protection, identification standards, and continuity policy.
• D. Policies of the Committee on National Security Systems: References policies addressing national security systems.
• E. OMB Circulars and Memoranda: Lists Office of Management and Budget (OMB) circulars and memoranda related to information management, internal control, privacy, and cybersecurity.
• F. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST): Details Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) and Special Publications (SP) relevant to cybersecurity and information systems.
• G. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA): Mentions CISA's role in supply chain risk management.
• H. Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC): References CMMC and its accreditation.
• I. National Defense Authorization Act of 2019: Highlights sections related to supply chain risk management and telecommunications equipment.

This document is crucial for bidders as it outlines the foundational legal and policy requirements for cybersecurity and SCRM that contractors must adhere to. Understanding these references will help potential vendors assess their compliance capabilities and prepare proposals that meet government expectations regarding security and risk management throughout the period of performance and at the task order level.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document is a Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management (C-SCRM) Plan Template. It outlines the requirements and controls necessary to manage cybersecurity risks within the supply chain for federal information systems and organizations. It serves as a guide for developing and implementing a comprehensive C-SCRM strategy.

• System Information: Details on system name, identifier, offering and provider types, and system description.
• Security Categorization: Information on data types, impact levels (confidentiality, integrity, availability) based on NIST SP 800-60 Vol. 2 and FIPS 199.
• Controls Implementation: Detailed breakdown of C-SCRM controls across various families (Access Control, Awareness and Training, Audit and Accountability, etc.) aligned with NIST SP 800-53 and NIST SP 800-161.
• Roles and Responsibilities: Defines C-SCRM roles at enterprise, mission/business process, and operational levels.
• Acquisition and Lifecycle Integration: Emphasizes integrating C-SCRM throughout the System Development Life Cycle (SDLC) and acquisition processes.
• Legal and Regulatory Basis: Lists applicable statutes, executive orders, directives, and standards (e.g., FISMA, E.O. 13636, NIST SP 800-53).

This document details the cybersecurity and supply chain risk management requirements that may be imposed on contractors. Bidders should review the control requirements and supplemental guidance to understand the security obligations and compliance expectations related to the systems and services they may provide. It highlights the importance of secure development practices, access control, auditing, incident response, and continuous monitoring within the supply chain.

Amendment / Modification

This amendment (0001) modifies the solicitation identified by number 47QTCB24R0009, originally dated 06/28/2024.

Key changes include:

• RFP Attachment J.P-9, Model Individual Subcontracting Plan: Adjusted the Small Disadvantaged Business Goal from 7% to 15% and re-ordered "Goals by Small Business Subcategory" for proper calculation.
• RFP Attachment J.P-10, GSA Form 527: Reformatted to resolve a technical compatibility issue with the A3 Proposal Intake System (Symphony).
• RFP Attachment J.P-12, C-SCRM References: Corrected a file property error affecting the displayed title.
• RFP Attachment J.P-13, C-SCRM Plan Template: Provided an updated template that aligns with the C-SCRM Plan Preparation Guide.

New versions of Attachments J.P-9, J.P-10, J.P-12, and J.P-13, marked with "V.2" in the filename, have been uploaded to SAM.gov and must be included in the final proposal submission.

Specific RFP Attachments: J.P-9, J.P-10, J.P-12, and J.P-13.

New versions of the specified attachments (V.2) are required for the final proposal submission. Questions regarding this amendment can be submitted via the provided form.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document is a template for an Individual Subcontracting Plan (ISP) required for the Alliant 3 GWAC (Solicitation #47QTCB24R0009). It provides a framework for offerors to detail their plans for subcontracting with small businesses, including specific socioeconomic categories.

• Instructions: Provides guidance on reviewing FAR requirements (Subpart 19.7) and understanding statutory obligations for small business participation.
• Identification Data: Requires offeror information, contract details (Solicitation #47QTCB24R0009), NAICS code (541512), place of performance (Worldwide), and contact information for the Subcontracting Program Administrator.
• Utilization Goals: Templates for calculating planned subcontracting dollars and percentages for "All Small Businesses" and "Other than Small Business (OTSB)" for both base and option periods.
• Socioeconomic Goals: Templates for detailing planned subcontracting amounts and percentages for specific small business categories: Veteran-Owned Small (VOSB), Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small (SDVOSB), HUBZone, Small Disadvantaged Business (SDB), and Women Owned Small Business (WOSB).
• FAR Elements: Sections to describe the method for developing goals, commitment to good faith effort, methods for identifying potential sources, equitable opportunity assurance, and principal types of supplies/services to be subcontracted (including NAICS codes).
• Statements, Assurances, and Signatures: Acknowledgment of statements regarding payment basis, plan as a material contract part, inclusion of indirect costs, and consequences of non-compliance. Assurances cover "flow down" of FAR clauses, requiring subcontractor plans, reporting via eSRS, good faith efforts, and timely payments.

Offerors must use this template to develop and submit their Individual Subcontracting Plan as part of their proposal. It outlines the specific requirements and format for detailing subcontracting goals and commitments to small and disadvantaged businesses. Failure to submit a negotiated subcontracting plan can make an offeror ineligible for award.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document, GSA Form 527, "Contractor's Qualifications and Financial Information," is a required component for prospective offerors. Its purpose is to assist the government in determining the financial responsibility and capability of offerors to fulfill contractual obligations. It serves as a tool for risk mitigation and transparency in the procurement process.

The form requires detailed information across several sections:

• General Information: Business name, address, taxpayer ID, type of organization, trade style, former business names, kind of business, and ownership information.
• Government Financial Aid and Indebtedness: Information on delinquency with federal debt, amounts owed to the government, and current government financing.
• Financial Statements: A balance sheet and income statement, including details on assets, liabilities, net worth, sales, costs, expenses, and income.
• Banking and Finance Company Information: Details on banking relationships, term loans, lines of credit, and secured loans.
• Principal Merchandise or Raw Material Supplier Information: Information on suppliers and past due accounts payable.
• Construction/Service Contracts Information: Details on current contracts in force and largest jobs completed in the last five years.
• Surety Bonds Information: Details on surety companies and bonding coverage.
• Remarks: A section for additional explanations.

Bidders must complete and submit this form accurately and thoroughly. The information provided will be used by the government to assess the offeror's financial stability and capacity to perform the contract. Failure to provide complete and accurate information may impact the responsibility determination and, consequently, the award of the contract. This form is specifically referenced in Section L.5.5 of the solicitation regarding responsibility determinations.

Solicitation / RFP / RFQ

This document is a solicitation for an unspecified product or service. It outlines the terms and conditions for potential offerors to submit proposals.

The Table of Contents indicates the following sections are included:

• Solicitation/Contract Form

• Supplies or Services and Prices/Costs

• Description/Specifications/Work Statement

• Packaging and Marking

• Inspection and Acceptance

• Deliveries or Performance

• Contract Administration Data

• Special Contract Requirements

• Contract Clauses

• List of Attachments

• Representations, Certifications and Other Statements of Offerors

• Instructions, Conditions, and Notices to Offerors

• Evaluation Factors for Award

• The solicitation number is 47QTCB24R0009.

• The offer acceptance period is 365 calendar days.

• Offers must be fully completed by the offeror.

• Specific submission instructions, including location and deadline, are detailed in Section L.3.4.

• Evaluation factors for award are outlined in Section M.

• The solicitation type is indicated as "Request for Proposal."

• Section 22 indicates potential for "Other Than Full Open Competition" under 10 U.S.C. 3204(a) or 41 U.S.C. 3304(a).

• The document is Standard Form 33 (Rev. 12/2022).

• A list of attachments is provided in Section J.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document, "J.P-1 Contractor Teaming Arrangement (CTA) Template," is a form provided by the government for use in specific situations related to the Alliant 3 Unrestricted GWAC Solicitation No.: 47QTCB24R0009. It is intended to validate an Offeror's performance on a project completed as a member of an existing or previous Contractor Team Arrangement (CTA).

• Part I: Relevant Experience Offeror and CTA Information: Collects details about the Offeror and the CTA, including names, UEIs, CTA type, and the number of CTA members.
• Part II: Project Identification: Gathers specific information about the project for which experience is being claimed, such as contract number, project title, agency, period of performance, and location.
• Part III: Project Narrative: Requires a detailed narrative (up to 5000 characters) explaining the CTA member's experience on the project.
• Part IV: Offeror Certification: An area for the Offeror to certify the accuracy of the information provided.
• Part V: CTA Member Certification: Requires certification from other CTA members (excluding the Offeror) to confirm the Offeror's role and the exclusivity of claiming credit for the project experience.

This form is crucial for bidders who wish to claim project experience gained as part of a previous Contractor Team Arrangement (CTA) for the Alliant 3 Unrestricted GWAC. Bidders must use this template to document and validate that experience. The form requires input from the Offeror and certification from other CTA members, ensuring that the claimed experience is accurately represented and validated according to the solicitation's requirements. Failure to complete and submit this form correctly may impact the evaluation of the bidder's relevant experience.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document, "A3 Primary NAICS Code Relevant Experience Project Template," is an attachment to a solicitation (Solicitation No.: 47QTCB24R0009). Its purpose is to collect detailed information from offerors regarding specific projects that demonstrate their relevant experience, particularly in relation to a primary NAICS code.

Part I: Project Identification

• Offeror Name, UEI, Contract/Order Number
• Project Title, Customer Name
• Total Period of Performance (including options)
• Project Value
• Funding Agency ID
• Questions regarding subcontractor work, cost-reimbursement, foreign locations, and previous teaming arrangements.
• NAICS Group Project Identifier and NAICS Code.

Part II: Project Reference Information

• Contact details for the Cognizant Project Official (for Federal or Commercial Projects) or Contracting Officer.

Part III: Project Description

• A narrative statement (max 5,000 characters) demonstrating how the project fulfilled claimed scoring criteria, referencing specific sections within supporting documents and Symphony Tagging.

Part IV: Project Verification Method

• A signature block attesting to the truthfulness and completeness of the provided information.

This template is crucial for bidders to document and present their past performance and relevant experience. It requires specific details about projects, including their scope, value, performance period, and key personnel. The narrative section is critical for substantiating claims made in response to the solicitation's evaluation criteria. Proper completion and submission of this form are essential for demonstrating the offeror's capability and suitability for the contract.

Solicitation / RFP / RFQ

This document is an Official Request for Proposal (RFP) for the Alliant 3 Governmentwide Acquisition Contract (GWAC). It is a Multiple Award, Indefinite-Delivery, Indefinite-Quantity (IDIQ) contract designed to provide information technology (IT) services-based solutions for Federal Government agencies. The contract allows for the application of technology to meet current and evolving needs on a global basis, encompassing a broad range of IT services and emerging technologies.

• The scope includes integrated IT services-based solutions, encompassing all current leading-edge technologies and any new technologies that may emerge during the contract period. This includes support for all IT development methodologies, including Agile.

• Services include infrastructure, application services, IT management services, cloud computing, big data analytics, energy/sustainability management IT services, ancillary services, supplies, and construction.

• Specific IT services are aligned with the Federal Enterprise Architecture (FEA) and Department of Defense Information Enterprise Architecture (DoD IEA) reference models.

• Cybersecurity and Supply Chain Risk Management (C-SCRM) requirements are detailed, including adherence to NIST SP 800-171 and other relevant standards.

• This is a Multiple Award GWAC contract.

• The contract period is from an unspecified start date through an unspecified end date, with options for extension, potentially up to 10 years.

• There is no maximum dollar ceiling for the Master Contract or for individual Task Orders.

• A minimum contract guarantee of $2,500 per Alliant 3 Base Contract is specified.

• A Contract Access Fee (CAF) of 0.75% is charged on orders.

• Proposals will be evaluated using a "Highest Technically Rated Offerors with a Fair and Reasonable Price" (HTR/F&RP) approach.

• Technical factors (Past Performance, Relevant Experience, Systems, Certifications, and Clearances, Organizational Risk Assessment) are considered more important than price.

• Evaluation will be conducted in phases, starting with a screening process and acceptability review.

• Pricing will be evaluated for fairness and reasonableness only for those Offerors achieving one of the top 76 verified technical scores.

• Key deadlines include proposal submission by 10/28/2024, 4:00 p.m. ET.

• This is an unrestricted GWAC, but specific Task Orders may have set-aside requirements.

• Small business subcontracting goals are outlined, with a total goal of 50% for Small Businesses.

• The document includes extensive detail on labor categories, contract clauses, special contract requirements, and evaluation factors.

• Numerous attachments are referenced, providing templates and detailed guidance for various aspects of the proposal and contract.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document, Attachment J.P-3, is a template for Offerors to describe their relevant experience with Emerging Technologies (ET) for the Alliant 3 Unrestricted GWAC solicitation (Solicitation No.: 47QTCB24R0009).

Part I. Project Identification: Requires details such as Offeror Name, UEI, Contract Number, Project Title, whether work was performed as a subcontractor, Total Period of Performance, Project Value, and if the project was part of a teaming arrangement. It also includes fields for selecting an Emerging Technology Project Identifier and the specific Emerging Technology.

Part II. Project Reference Information: Requires contact details for the Cognizant Project Official (for Federal or Commercial Projects) or the Contracting Officer.

Part III. Project Description: Requires a description of how the selected Emerging Technology was integral to the performance of the project, referencing specific sections within supporting documents via Symphony Tagging. This section has a character limit of 5,000 characters (excluding an index).

Part IV. Project Verification Method: A signature block attesting to the truthfulness and completeness of the provided information.

This template is crucial for bidders to document and present their experience with emerging technologies as required by the solicitation. It directly impacts the evaluation of their proposal, specifically concerning relevant experience. Bidders must accurately complete all sections, including detailed project descriptions and verification information, to substantiate their qualifications.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document, "J.P-4 A3 Subcontractor Experience Project Template," is an attachment to the solicitation. It is designed to collect detailed information about a subcontractor's experience on a specific project. This information is required for the Offeror (subcontractor) to demonstrate their qualifications and experience relevant to the prime contract opportunity.

Part I: Project Identification

• Offeror (Subcontractor) Name, UEI
• Prime Contractor Name, UEI, Contract Number, Order Number (if applicable)
• Project Title, Customer Name
• Total Period of Performance, Total Prime Project Value, Subcontract Project Value
• Funding Agency ID (if applicable)
• Cost-Reimbursement status
• Foreign Locations status
• Status regarding existing or previous contractor teaming arrangements
• NAICS Group Project Identifier (if applicable)
• Emerging Technology Project Identifier (if applicable)

Part II: Project Reference Information

• Contact information for the Cognizant Prime Contractor Project Official.

Part III: Project Description

• A narrative statement (max 5,000 characters) detailing the subcontractor's experience on the project. This section requires specific references within the document(s) via Symphony Tagging to substantiate claims.

Part IV: Prime Contractor Attestation

• A signature block for the Prime Contractor Representative to attest to the truthfulness and accuracy of the provided information.

Subcontractors intending to bid on this opportunity must complete this template accurately and thoroughly. It is a critical component for demonstrating their project experience and qualifications as required by the solicitation (specifically referencing Section L.5.2.2 and L.5.2.3.5, L.5.2.3.6, L.5.1.4 as noted in the document). Failure to provide complete and accurate information may impact the evaluation of the proposal.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document, "J.P-5 A3 Small Business Engagement Template," is an attachment to the solicitation. It is designed to capture information related to small business engagement for a specific project.

Part I: Project Identification

• Offeror Contractor Name and UEI
• Small Business Contractor Name and UEI
• Confirmation of engagement with a small business under the specified NAICS code
• Engagement Date
• Indication of whether Emerging Technology was demonstrated

Part II: Project Reference Information

• Details of the Cognizant Project Official (Name, Title, Contractor Name, Phone, Email)
• Customer Name
• Total Period of Performance (including options)
• Total Project Value

Part III: Project Description

• A narrative statement detailing the small business's experience on the project, referencing specific sections of the solicitation (Section L.5.2.4.4).
• Character limit of 5,000 characters for the narrative, excluding the required Index.

Part IV: Small Business Contractor Attestation

• A signature attestation from the Prime Contractor Representative confirming the truthfulness, accuracy, and completeness of the provided information.

Bidders must complete and submit this template as part of their proposal. It is crucial for demonstrating compliance with small business requirements and detailing the experience of any small business subcontractors involved in the project. The information provided here will be used to assess the offeror's approach to small business utilization.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document is Attachment J.P-6, the "A3 Past Performance Rating Template." It is designed to be filled out by a rater to assess an offeror's past performance on a project relevant to the solicitation. It serves as a standardized method for evaluating performance across several key areas.

• Past Performance Project Identification: Fields for Offeror Name, Contract Number, Project Title, Period of Performance, NAICS Code, Project Value, and whether the work was performed as a subcontractor or part of a Contractor Team Arrangement (CTA).
• Past Performance Reference Information: Fields for the Rater's Name, Title, Agency/Customer, Phone, E-mail, and Signature. It also includes fields for Contracting Officer Information if the rating is not supplied by the primary rater.
• Evaluation Areas: The template outlines six evaluation areas, each with definitions for adjectival ratings (Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, Unsatisfactory, Not Applicable). These areas are:
  1. Quality of Service
  2. Schedule
  3. Cost Control
  4. Management
  5. Small Business Subcontracting
  6. Regulatory Compliance
• Additional Comments: A section for detailed comments to substantiate ratings, particularly for Marginal or Unsatisfactory ratings, or to explain 'Not Applicable' ratings.

Bidders should understand that this template will be used by the Government to evaluate their past performance. Offerors may need to provide information to the rater to ensure accurate and complete project identification. The evaluation criteria defined within this template will inform bidders on what aspects of their past performance are most critical for this solicitation. Understanding these criteria can help bidders prepare their own past performance narratives or provide relevant supporting documentation.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document, "J.P-14 A3 C-SCRM Control Selections.xlsx", is an Excel spreadsheet containing a list of Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management (C-SCRM) Controls selected from NIST Special Publication 800-161 Revision 1. It is referenced in Section L.5.5.2 of the solicitation (Solicitation No.: 47QTCB24R0009) for the Alliant 3 Unrestricted GWAC.

The spreadsheet lists specific C-SCRM controls, categorized by Control Family, Control Family Name, Control Identifier, and the Control Name (or Control Enhancement). It includes controls related to Access Control, Audit and Accountability, Configuration Management, Incident Response, Risk Assessment, System and Communications Protection, and Supply Chain Risk Management, among others.

Bidders must review this list to understand the specific NIST C-SCRM controls that are required or relevant to this opportunity. This information is crucial for developing proposals that demonstrate compliance with the cybersecurity requirements outlined in the solicitation, particularly concerning supply chain risk management. The selection of these controls will likely impact the technical approach, security architecture, and overall compliance strategy for any proposed solution.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document, "A3 CLIMATE CHANGE RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN CRITERIA GUIDE," outlines the requirements for an Industry Partner to develop and submit a Climate Change Risk Management Plan. This plan is intended to help GSA understand climate-related risks to its supply chain and the partner's ability to manage them.

• Process for Risk Management: Bidders must describe their methodology for identifying, assessing, and responding to climate-related risks (e.g., wildfires, flooding, extreme heat, sea level rise).

• Inherent Risks: Bidders need to identify specific climate-related risks that could have a significant financial or strategic impact on their business.

• Business Continuity Plan: This includes detailing contingency plans and response protocols for both event-driven changes (e.g., hurricanes, earthquakes) and chronic climate shifts (e.g., changes in precipitation, temperature, sea level).

• Impacted Assets/Services: Bidders must describe which assets, products, and services would be most significantly disrupted by short-term acute impacts and long-term cumulative impacts.

• Submission Requirement: The Climate Change Risk Management Plan must be submitted to the Contracting Officer (CO) and Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) within 12 months after the Notice to Proceed.

• Evaluation: Compliance with the timely submission of this plan and a follow-up report will be evaluated in CPARS or another contract performance assessment report.

• Scope: This document defines critical criteria for a post-award plan that all other-than-small business Industry Partners must adhere to.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document, "Attachment J.P-17 A3 C-SCRM Plan Preparation Guide," provides prospective offerors with a standardized approach to identifying, assessing, and mitigating risks within their cybersecurity supply chain. It serves as a guide for developing a comprehensive Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management (C-SCRM) plan.

• Guidance and Standardization: Offers detailed instructions and criteria for C-SCRM plan development, ensuring a uniform understanding and approach.
• Risk Management: Equips offerors to identify potential cybersecurity threats and vulnerabilities, and to develop mitigation strategies.
• Compliance: Ensures proposals meet regulatory and contractual requirements for cybersecurity and supply chain risk management.
• Evaluation Consistency: Provides a standardized framework for evaluating C-SCRM plans.
• Cybersecurity Posture Enhancement: Aims to improve the overall cybersecurity posture of the supply chain.

This guide is critical for bidders to understand the specific requirements and expectations for developing their C-SCRM plans. Adhering to this guide will help ensure proposals meet the highest standards of security, compliance, and risk management, thereby supporting the government's goal of securing the supply chain against evolving cyber threats. It directly impacts proposal preparation by outlining the necessary components and structure of the C-SCRM plan.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document, "J.P-7 A3 Federal Contract FPDS Crosswalk Sample," serves as an attachment to the Alliant 3 solicitation. Its purpose is to provide guidance to potential bidders on how to use the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) Report to verify relevant experience submissions. It details the steps required to access and interpret FPDS reports, which can be used to substantiate claimed scoring elements in a proposal.

• Accessing FPDS: Instructions are provided to navigate to www.fpds.gov and use the ezSearch function with identifiers such as contract number, task order number, or contractor name.
• Interpreting FPDS Reports: The document explains that the "View" page in FPDS contains various data categories, including "Transaction Information" and "Preference Programs/Other Data." Sample FPDS reports are included on pages 3-6 of the attachment.
• Crosswalk Table: Page 2 provides a table that crosswalks elements from the J.P-2 / J.P-3 Relevant Experience Project Template with corresponding data fields in FPDS-NG. This table helps bidders identify which FPDS data can verify specific scoring elements.
• Alternative Verification: If an FPDS report is unavailable or insufficient for verification, bidders are directed to alternative verification documents mentioned in solicitation section L.5.2.3.1.

This attachment is crucial for bidders preparing their proposals, particularly for the "Relevant Experience" section. It clarifies how to obtain and utilize FPDS data to demonstrate past performance and experience, which are likely evaluation factors. Understanding this process will help bidders ensure their experience submissions are adequately supported and meet the solicitation's requirements for verification.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document, "J.P-8 A3 Price Template.xlsx", is a pricing template required for offerors responding to Solicitation #47QTCB24R0009. It is used to propose fully-burdened maximum hourly labor rates for Time-and-Material/Labor-Hour (T&M/L-H) Task Orders over a 15-year contract period.

• Four Tabs: Offerors must complete 1_GovernmentWorksite, 2_ContractorWorksite, 3a_GovtRateEvidence, and 3b_ContractorRateEvidence. The 4_TotalPrice tab calculates automatically.
• Labor Rates: Data entry is required for proposed maximum fully-burdened labor rates for various labor categories in Tabs 1 and 2.
• Rate Evidence: If proposed rates exceed the government-referenced Alliant 2 maximum rates, offerors must provide evidence of prior acceptance on federal contracts in Tabs 3a and 3b.
• Escalation: A BLS escalation factor (3.93%) is applied to calculate rates for contract years 2-15.
• Total Price: Calculated automatically in Tab 4, this serves as a rated offer factor for source selection.

This template is critical for bidders to accurately propose labor rates and calculate their total price. It dictates the format for submitting pricing information and requires justification for any rates exceeding government benchmarks. Failure to complete this template correctly may impact proposal evaluation.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document is the "J.P-11 A3 Contractor C-SCRM Responsibility Questionnaire" (Version 1.00 - 2022-10-13), an Excel spreadsheet designed to assess a contractor's responsibility regarding the basic safeguarding of covered contractor information systems, as per FAR 52.204-21. It requires offerors to provide specific contact information and answer a series of "Yes/No" questions related to various security controls.

• Contact Information: Offeror name, Point-of-Contact (POC) name, email, and phone number.
• Access Control: Questions regarding limiting system access to authorized users, transactions, and controlling external connections.
• Identification and Authentication: Questions on identifying and authenticating users, processes, and devices.
• Media Protection: Questions on sanitizing or destroying media containing Federal Contract Information.
• Physical Protection: Questions on limiting physical access to information systems and monitoring visitor activity.
• System and Communications Protection: Questions on monitoring and protecting communications at system boundaries.
• System and Information Integrity: Questions on identifying and correcting system flaws, and protecting against malicious code.
• FAR Clause Compliance: Specific questions related to FAR 52.204-23 (Prohibition on Contracting for Kaspersky Lab products), FAR 52.204-25/26/24 (Telecommunications and video surveillance services/equipment), and FAR 52.204-29/30 (Federal Acquisition Supply Chain Security Act Orders).
• Certification: A final certification statement attesting to the accuracy of the provided information, with a required signature.

This questionnaire is critical for bidders to complete accurately. Failure to provide "Yes" to all items may disqualify an organization from award. Bidders must provide their responses in the designated gray shaded areas. The document references RFP Section L.5.5.2 for completion instructions. It also includes definitions for key terms like "Covered contractor information system" and "Federal contract information."

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document is a "Document Verification and Self-Scoring Worksheet" (Attachment J.P-16) for the Alliant 3 Unrestricted GWAC (Solicitation Number: 47QTCB24R0009). It is intended to help offerors verify and self-score their proposals against the requirements outlined in Section L of the solicitation, specifically referencing instructions in L.5.1.2.

• Offeror Information: A field to fill in the Offeror Name.
• Section L Requirements: The worksheet breaks down proposal requirements by section (L.5 General, L.5.2 Relevant Experience, L.5.3 Past Performance, L.5.4 Systems/Certifications/Clearances, L.5.5 Responsibility, L.5.6 Organizational Risk Assessment, L.5.7 Sustainability Disclosures).
• Scoring Mechanism: For each element, there are columns for "Enter Yes OR No for each question as applicable," "Point Value," and "Score." Offerors are expected to fill in "Yes" or "No" and calculate their score based on the provided point values.
• Specific Criteria: Detailed sub-sections within Relevant Experience (Primary NAICS Code, Size & Complexity, Multiple Agency Awards, Cost-Reimbursement, Foreign Location) and Emerging Technology Experience (AI, Big Data, Cloud Computing, Cyber Security, etc.) with specific scoring criteria.
• Systems & Certifications: Includes requirements for accounting systems, purchasing systems, FPRA/FPRR, EVMS, estimating systems, CMMI, ISO certifications, and government facility clearances.

This worksheet is a critical tool for bidders to ensure their proposal is compliant and to understand how it will be evaluated. It guides the preparation of required documentation and helps bidders assess their strengths and weaknesses against the solicitation's criteria. Offerors must complete this worksheet as part of their proposal submission, following the instructions in Section L.5.1.2.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document, "J.P-18 Labor Rate Attestation," is an attachment required for the Alliant 3 Request for Proposal (RFP). It serves to provide evidence for proposed labor-hour rates that exceed the Government-referenced Alliant 2 published labor-hour rates. This attestation is necessary for the "Fully-Burdened Rate Evaluation" as outlined in section L.5.8.2 of the RFP.

• Attestation Statement: The offeror must attest that the submission is true and correct, prepared from the contractor's books and records, and in accordance with the Solicitation and Contracting Officer's instructions.
• Signature of Approving Official: Requires the name, title, and signature of a company representative.
• Table 1: Contract Number Evidence List: This table requires offerors to list contract numbers and task order numbers for each proposed Labor Category (LCAT) rate that exceeds the Alliant 2 published rates. It also requires indicating whether the work will be performed at a Government or Contractor worksite.

Bidders proposing labor rates higher than those published for Alliant 2 must complete and submit this form. It is crucial for supporting their proposed pricing strategy during the evaluation phase. The form requires specific details about existing contracts and work locations to justify these higher rates. The submission must include the signed attestation and a PDF copy of the relevant rate table from each awarded contract.