Tinker AFB 2026 Multiple Award Construction Contract (MACC)- Draft Request for Proposal (RFP)

Questions & Answers / Clarifications

This document contains responses to Frequently Asked Questions (RFIs) regarding the TINKER MACC solicitation. It clarifies various aspects of the solicitation, including project examples, magnitude, contractor numbers, award timelines, and proposal submission requirements.

• Example Projects: A list of priority projects will be published with the solicitation to provide examples of upcoming work (e.g., roofing, bathrooms, ductwork).
• Magnitude of Construction: Most task orders will range between $1,000,000 and $5,000,000.
• Number of Contractors: The government intends to award the MACC to a maximum of 10 contractors.
• Award Timeline: The planned award date is Q1 of CY 2027, subject to change.
• Seed Project: No seed project will be awarded; instead, each contract will begin with a post-award conference.
• Proposal Submission: Proposals can be submitted via DoD SAFE.
• Page Limitations: Several questions addressed page limitations for work samples and supporting documentation, with clarifications that cover sheets have limits, but supporting documentation generally does not, or has been revised.
• Joint Ventures: Joint Venture contracts can utilize data from any company within the organizational structure, provided the JV itself submits at least 5 work samples.
• Past Performance: Work samples and past performance requirements will utilize a 10-year period. PPQs will be accepted for non-federal projects.

This document provides significant clarifications that will impact how bidders prepare their proposals, particularly regarding project examples, submission methods, page limitations, and the scope of past performance and work sample requirements. Bidders should review these responses carefully to ensure their proposals meet the updated understanding of the solicitation's requirements.

Questions & Answers / Clarifications

This document contains a series of questions and answers (RFIs) related to the Tinker MACC (Multiple Award Construction Contract) solicitation. It clarifies various aspects of the solicitation, including proposal submission requirements, contract details, and evaluation criteria.

• Example Projects: A list of priority projects will be published with the solicitation to provide examples of upcoming work.
• Project Magnitude: Task orders will vary, with most expected to be between $1,000,000 and $5,000,000.
• Number of Contractors: The government intends to award contracts to a maximum of 10 contractors.
• Award Timeline: The planned award date is Q1 of CY 2027, subject to change.
• Seed Project: No seed project will be awarded; each contract will begin with an initial Task Order for a post-award conference.
• Page Limitations: Several questions address page limitations for work samples and supporting documentation, with government responses indicating updates and clarifications to Table 1 regarding these limits.
• Proposal Submission: Proposals can be accepted through DoD Safe.
• Subcontracting: A designer can be a teaming member for the contract.
• Joint Ventures: Contractors can use previous involvement in a joint venture, provided they demonstrate meaningful involvement.
• Past Performance: Past performance requirements will be revised to align with work sample periods, currently set at 10 years.
• Certifications: The term 'work sample' will be removed from certification sections, requiring supporting documentation instead.
• Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQs): PPQs will be accepted for non-federal projects.

This document provides significant clarifications that may impact how bidders prepare their proposals, particularly regarding page limitations, submission methods, and the demonstration of experience. Bidders should review these Q&As carefully to ensure their proposals meet the updated requirements.

Solicitation / RFP / RFQ

This document, Section L, provides instructions to offerors for the Multiple Award Construction Contract (MACC) Request for Proposal (RFP) FA8137-25-R-0013, issued by the Air Force Sustainment Center. It outlines the requirements for submitting a compliant proposal.

• Proposals must be clear, concise, and provide sufficient detail for evaluation.

• Offerors must not take exceptions to any terms and conditions within the RFP.

• Specific formatting and content requirements are detailed for various proposal volumes, including Executive Summary, Technical Experience, Past Performance, and Contract Documentation.

• A minimum of 12 work samples demonstrating technical experience are required, with at least one per category.

• Work samples must be from contracts performed as the Prime Contractor within the last 10 years.

• Specific categories for evaluation include Commercial, Industrial & Residential Bldg. Multi Trade, Construction for the US Government, Multiple Construction Multi Trade, Utility System Construction, Construction in Secured Areas, Individual Trade, Design-Build Projects, Certifications (PMP, LEED, Safety, Quality), and Staffing (Trade Laborers, Architects/Engineers, Program Manager, Quality Control, Site Safety, Design Program Manager, Superintendents).

• This is a Multiple Award Indefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract.

• The proposal validity statement must be valid for 300 calendar days from the proposal due date.

• Proposals are due by 1600 CST on DAY MONTH YEAR.

• Submission is electronic via DoD Safe or email to the PCO and Contract Specialist.

• Late proposals will be processed per FAR 52.215-1(c).

• Proposals will be evaluated based on the Highest Technically Rated Offerors with a Fair and Reasonable Price (HTRO) Minimum Technical Threshold Rating (MTTR) methodology.

• Evaluation will use the Self-Scoring Matrix (Appendix C to Section L) and Past Performance information.

• Offerors must be registered in SAM.gov.

• Subcontracting relationships will not be accepted as part of the team structure; only parent, affiliated, or subsidiary companies, and Joint Ventures are permitted.

• All referenced documents are available at SAM.gov.

• Offerors are encouraged to subscribe for email notifications for updates.

• The PCO is the sole point of contact for this acquisition. Questions must be submitted by 7 OCT 2025.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document is Appendix C to Section L of Solicitation No.: FA813725R0013, titled "Self Scoring Matrix." It provides a detailed breakdown of how offerors will be scored based on their relevant construction and design experience, as well as certifications and staffing.

• Section 1: Relevant Construction Experience: Outlines criteria for scoring construction projects completed within the last 10 years, categorized by project type (Commercial, Industrial, Residential, US Government, Multi-Trade, Utility Systems, Secured Areas, Individual Trades like AT/FP Measures, Fire Protection, Road Construction, Hazardous Material Abatement, Building Automation, HEMP Shielding, Roofing, and Airfield Construction). Each category has specific sub-criteria related to project value, number of trades, and completion status.
• Section 2: Design Experience: Details scoring for Design-Build projects, focusing on the design documents' compliance with Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) and International Code Council (ICC) standards. It evaluates specifications, drawings, and calculations for various building elements.
• Section 3: Certifications/Innovation: Assigns points for various professional certifications held by the offeror's company, including Project Management Professionals, Credentialed Professionals (Architect, Civil Engineer, Structural Engineer, etc.), LEED Professionals, and Safety/Quality Professionals.
• Section 4: Staffing: Evaluates the offeror's in-house capabilities by scoring the number of personnel in specific roles such as Trade/Construction Workers, Architects/Engineers, Contract Program Managers, Quality Control Managers, Site Safety and Health Managers, Design Program Managers, and Superintendents.

This matrix is crucial for bidders as it directly informs how their proposals will be evaluated. Understanding the scoring criteria allows offerors to tailor their submissions to maximize their scores by highlighting relevant experience, certifications, and staffing that align with the government's requirements and priorities. It provides a clear roadmap for demonstrating qualifications and competitive strengths.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document, Appendix E, is a Past Performance Information Sheet that bidders must complete and submit as part of their proposal. It is designed to collect detailed information about the bidder's past performance on relevant work samples to aid the government in evaluating their capabilities.

Part I: Past Performance Identification

• Contractor Name
• Contract Number
• Task Order Number (if applicable)
• Subcontract Number (if applicable)
• Customer (Agency, organization, or client name, including office symbol and program name if a government agency)
• Period of Performance (MM/YYYY – MM/YYYY or MM/YYYY – Present)
• Work Sample Value (final or most recent total contract/order value, including options)
• Work Sample Identifier(s) (WS1-WS6)
• Availability of a CPAR (Contractor Performance Assessment Report) (Yes/No)

Part II: Past Performance Information/Points of Contact

• Contracting Officer (current or most recent, if available)
• Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) or Relevant Customer Point of Contact (Primary or Alternate COR, or customer POC if no COR)
• Each work sample requires at least two (2) Points of Contact.

Part III: Past Performance Narrative (2 Pages Limit per sample)

• Brief description of the work sample.
• Additional information on efforts to resolve contract performance problems and manage program risk.
• Demonstration of management actions employed to overcome problems and achieve improvements.

This form is critical for bidders to demonstrate their experience and capability through past performance. Accurate and complete submission of this information, including detailed narratives and valid points of contact, will be essential for the government's evaluation of the bidder's suitability for the opportunity. Failure to provide complete information may negatively impact the evaluation.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document, "Attachment 3d Appendix D MACC Cross Reference Matrix," serves as a matrix for offerors to cross-reference their relevant experience projects against the requirements outlined in the solicitation. It details how specific projects submitted by offerors will be evaluated and scored based on various categories and thresholds.

• Categories of Experience: The matrix breaks down experience into several categories, including Commercial, Industrial & Residential Buildings (Multi-Trade), Construction for the US Government, Multiple Construction Multi-Trade, Utility System Construction, Construction in Secured Areas, Individual Trade, and Design Experience (Design-Build).
• Project Submission Requirements: For each category, the document specifies the number of projects to be submitted (e.g., 0-4 projects, 2-5 projects) and the conditions they must meet (e.g., completed within the last 10 years, at least 80% completed by a specific date).
• Scoring Criteria: Each project submission is assigned a maximum point value based on factors such as contract value, number of trades, or whether it was a prime contract.
• Staffing and Geographic Expertise: Separate sections address the evaluation of offeror's staffing levels (Trade/Construction Workers, Architects/Engineers) and geographic expertise (existing offices).
• Instructions for Offerors: The document provides clear instructions on how to fill out the matrix, including referencing specific contract documents, SOWs, and providing details like document titles, dates, and page numbers.

This attachment is critical for bidders to understand how their past performance and experience will be evaluated. It guides them in selecting and presenting projects that best align with the solicitation's requirements to maximize their scoring potential. Bidders must carefully review each category and its associated scoring to tailor their proposal effectively.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document is Appendix B, the Work Sample Cover Sheet, which must be completed by offerors. It serves to identify and provide contact information for work samples submitted as part of a proposal.

• Part I: Work Sample Identification: Requires contractor name, contract number, task order number, subcontract number, customer name (including agency, organization, or client name, and office symbol/program name if applicable), period of performance, work sample value, and a work sample identifier (WS1-WS6).
• Part II: Work Sample Information/Points of Contact: Requires contact information for the Contracting Officer, and the Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) or Relevant Customer Point of Contact. Offerors must provide at least two points of contact for each work sample.
• Part III: Work Sample Description: Requires a brief description of the work sample, with a two-page limit. This section can also be used to describe relationships if a subsidiary or legal entity's work sample is used.

This cover sheet is essential for any bidder submitting work samples. It dictates the specific information and format required for identifying and detailing each work sample, ensuring that the government has the necessary details to evaluate them. Offerors must follow the instructions provided, including marking fields as 'Not Applicable' or 'N/A' where appropriate.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document, Appendix A, is titled "Corporate Relationships and Structures." It requires offerors to provide information regarding their corporate relationships and structures as part of their submission for the FA813725R0013 FY25 MACC opportunity. Offerors must fill in their name where indicated.

The form includes columns for:

• Company Name
• Address
• Cage Code (If Applicable)
• UEI (If Applicable)
• Relationship to Prime
• Applicable Work Sample(s)
• Name on Work Sample
• Documentation Provided

Bidders must complete this appendix to detail their corporate relationships and structures. This information is likely used by the government to assess potential conflicts of interest, understand teaming arrangements, and evaluate the offeror's organizational capacity and relevant experience. Failure to provide this information may impact the evaluation of the proposal.

Solicitation / RFP / RFQ

This document outlines the evaluation criteria for the Request for Proposal (RFP) FA8137-25-R-0013 for a Multiple Award Construction Contract (MACC) for the Air Force Sustainment Center. The award will be made to the Highest Technically Rated Offeror (HTRO) meeting specific criteria.

Proposals will be evaluated based on two factors:

• Factor 1: Technical Experience

  • Relevant Construction Experience (Categories 1-6)
  • Design Experience (Categories 7-8)
  • Certifications/Innovation (Category 9)
  • Staffing (Category 10)
  • Geographic Expertise (Category 11)

• Factor 2: Past Performance

• Contract Type: Multiple Award Construction Contract (MACC) - Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ)

• Period of Performance: One (1) base 5-year Program Ordering Period, with one (1) 5-year Option Period, for a total of ten (10) years.

• IDIQ Ceiling: $950 Million

• Minimum Guaranteed Task Order: $500.00 for the post-award conference.

• Evaluation Methodology: Highest Technically Rated Offeror (HTRO) source selection, in accordance with DoD Source Selection Procedures and FAR 15.3.

• Technical Experience: Offerors self-score their Technical Experience. The Government will validate these scores against a Minimum Technical Threshold Rating (MTTR) of 17,000 points. Offerors must meet or exceed this MTTR to be considered acceptable.

• Past Performance: Offerors who meet or exceed the MTTR will have their Past Performance evaluated for recency and relevancy. An "Acceptable" rating in Past Performance is required for award.

• Price/Cost: There is no cost/price evaluation at the IDIQ level.

• Discussions: The Government intends to award without discussions but reserves the right to conduct them if necessary.

• Award will be made to Offerors who meet the HTRO MTTR, have Acceptable Past Performance, conform to solicitation requirements, and are determined responsible.

• The number of contracts to be awarded is not specified.

• Offerors are not permitted to take exceptions to any terms and conditions within the RFP.

• Substantiation of claims in the Technical Experience self-score is the Offeror's responsibility. Unsubstantiated claims may result in a downward adjustment of the score.

• Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI) must be avoided, mitigated, or neutralized.

Statement of Work (SOW) / Performance Work Statement (PWS)

This Statement of Work (SOW) outlines the requirements for a Multiple Award Construction Contract (MACC) for General Construction Services at Tinker Air Force Base, Oklahoma. The MACC aims to accomplish a broad range of sustainment, maintenance, repair, alteration/renovation, and minor construction projects affecting real property facilities.

The contract covers various construction classifications, including Design-Build, Construction Only with Limited Design, and Construction Only. Task Orders (TOs) issued under this contract will define specific project requirements. The scope includes furnishing all materials, labor, plant, tools, transportation, equipment, testing services, and quality control necessary to provide a complete and usable end product.

• The final product must conform to Government-accepted commercial/industrial quality standards.

• The Contractor shall provide technical support and project management to process submittals in a timely manner.

• The Contractor must accommodate concurrent 'active' projects and assure quality and safety.

• Performance will be monitored through a three-phase inspection system.

• Deficiency prevention and correction are required.

• The contract is for General Construction Services at Tinker Air Force Base, Oklahoma.

• A start-up period of thirty (30) calendar days follows the basic contract award.

• Task Orders will have defined periods of performance.

• Personnel: Key personnel requirements include a Contract Program Manager, Quality Control Manager (QCM), Site Safety and Health Officer (SSHO), Design Program Manager, and Project Superintendent(s), each with specific experience and qualification mandates. Subcontractors must be licensed in Oklahoma.

• Design: Design submittals (preliminary, intermediate, pre-final, and final) are required, adhering to specific formats and review processes. Design must comply with Government design requirements and current editions of listed publications.

• Submittals: A comprehensive submittal process is outlined, including pre-construction, material, and design submittals, with specific timelines and approval requirements.

• Quality Control: A robust Quality Control (QC) program is mandated, including an inspection system and deficiency prevention methods.

• Communication: Clear communication protocols are established, including requirements for contactability of key personnel and standardized subject lines for electronic correspondence.

• Safety: Compliance with applicable safety and health requirements (EM 385-1-1, AFI 91-203, 29 CFR 1910, 29 CFR 1926) is mandatory. A Health and Safety Plan must be submitted.

• Other: Requirements for contractor vehicles, construction site controls (fencing, signs, barricades), protection of utilities and government property, outage and closure coordination, and airfield safety are detailed.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document, titled "Attachment_3d_Appendix_D_MACC_Cross_Reference_Matrix.xlsx," serves as a self-score sheet for offerors responding to Solicitation No. FA813725R0013 for the Air Force Sustainment Center PZIOC MACC. It is Appendix D to Section L and is designed to help bidders cross-reference their proposed experience and qualifications against the solicitation's requirements and scoring criteria.

This matrix outlines various categories for evaluating offeror experience and qualifications, including:

• Relevant Construction Experience (Section 1): Details requirements for projects in Commercial, Industrial & Residential, US Government, Multi-Trade, Utility System, Secured Areas, and Individual Trade categories. It specifies the number of projects, contract thresholds, and maximum point values for each.
• Relevant Design Experience (Section 2): Focuses on Design-Build projects, including requirements for prime contractor experience and the submission of design documents (specifications, drawings, calculations) compliant with Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) and International Code Council (ICC) standards.
• Certifications/Innovation (Section 3): Lists required or beneficial certifications for Project Management Professionals, Credentialed Professionals (Architect, Engineers, etc.), LEED Professionals, Safety Professionals, and Quality Professionals, with associated point values.
• Staffing (Section 4): Requires offerors to indicate the number of personnel in various roles such as Trade/Construction Workers, Architects/Engineers, Contract Program Managers, Quality Control Managers, Site Safety and Health Managers, Design Program Managers, and Superintendents, with corresponding point allocations.
• Geographic Expertise (Section 5): Assesses the offeror's proximity to specific Air Force bases (RAB, SAB) by requiring confirmation of an existing office within 25km.

This cross-reference matrix is crucial for bidders as it details the specific criteria and point values used for evaluating their proposals. Bidders must use this document to ensure they submit all required documentation and evidence of experience that aligns with the solicitation's evaluation factors, maximizing their potential score.

Solicitation / RFP / RFQ

This document provides instructions for preparing and submitting proposals for a Multiple Award Construction Contract (MACC) under Request for Proposal FA8137-25-R-0013. The source selection method is Highest Technically Rated Offerors with a Fair and Reasonable Price (HTRO) Minimum Technical Threshold Rating (MTTR).

Proposals must be clear, concise, and contain sufficient detail to substantiate claimed points on the Self-Scoring Matrix (Appendix C). Offerors must not take exceptions to solicitation terms and conditions. Specific formatting, page limitations, and submission requirements are detailed for each volume of the proposal.

This is for an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract. Ordering procedures will be outlined in Attachment 2_Ordering Guide.

• Proposal Due Date: DAY MONTH YEAR at 1600 Central Standard Time (CST). Proposals must be submitted electronically via DoD Safe.
• Evaluation: Proposals will be evaluated based on the HTRO MTTR criteria using the Self-Scoring Matrix (Appendix C).
• Points of Contact: All questions must be submitted via email to Ms. Sara Hinds (sara.hinds.2@us.af.mil) and 2d Lt Hailie Reyes (hailie.reyes@us.af.mil) or SrA Alexandra Henderson (alexandra.henderson@us.af.mil) no later than 1600 CST, 7 OCT 2025.
• Proposal Organization: Proposals are to be organized into four volumes: Executive Summary, Technical Experience, Past Performance, and Contract Documentation, with specific file naming conventions and page limits for each section.

No specific set-aside information is provided in this document. Offerors must be registered in SAM.gov.

• Referenced documents are available on SAM.gov.
• Offerors are encouraged to subscribe for email notifications.
• Debriefings will be provided in accordance with FAR 15.505 or 15.506.

Other / Unclassified

This document is a placeholder or error message indicating that the PDF viewer could not properly display the document content. It suggests upgrading to the latest version of Adobe Reader and provides links for download and assistance.

This document does not contain substantive information related to the SAM.gov opportunity. It appears to be a technical issue with the document rendering rather than content provided by the government. Bidders should disregard this document and look for other attachments or information related to the opportunity.

Other / Unclassified

This document is a placeholder or error message indicating that the PDF content could not be displayed by the current PDF viewer. It suggests upgrading to the latest version of Adobe Reader and provides links for download and assistance.

This document is not directly relevant to the opportunity's requirements, scope, or submission details. It appears to be a technical issue with the document display rather than content related to the procurement itself.

Other / Unclassified

This document is a placeholder or error message indicating that the PDF content could not be displayed by the viewer. It suggests upgrading to the latest version of Adobe Reader and provides links for download and assistance.

This document does not contain substantive information related to the SAM.gov opportunity. It is an administrative message related to document viewing capabilities.